From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sd@queasysnail.net, davem@davemloft.net,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jishi@redhat.com, sbrivio@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "net: ipv4: don't allow setting net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu below 68" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2018 11:01:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1520535664145177@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
net: ipv4: don't allow setting net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu below 68
to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
net-ipv4-don-t-allow-setting-net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu-below-68.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Mar 8 10:42:32 PST 2018
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:13:43 +0100
Subject: net: ipv4: don't allow setting net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu below 68
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
[ Upstream commit c7272c2f1229125f74f22dcdd59de9bbd804f1c8 ]
According to RFC 1191 sections 3 and 4, ICMP frag-needed messages
indicating an MTU below 68 should be rejected:
A host MUST never reduce its estimate of the Path MTU below 68
octets.
and (talking about ICMP frag-needed's Next-Hop MTU field):
This field will never contain a value less than 68, since every
router "must be able to forward a datagram of 68 octets without
fragmentation".
Furthermore, by letting net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu be set to negative
values, we can end up with a very large PMTU when (-1) is cast into u32.
Let's also make ip_rt_min_pmtu a u32, since it's only ever compared to
unsigned ints.
Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -122,9 +122,11 @@ static int ip_rt_redirect_silence __read
static int ip_rt_error_cost __read_mostly = HZ;
static int ip_rt_error_burst __read_mostly = 5 * HZ;
static int ip_rt_mtu_expires __read_mostly = 10 * 60 * HZ;
-static int ip_rt_min_pmtu __read_mostly = 512 + 20 + 20;
+static u32 ip_rt_min_pmtu __read_mostly = 512 + 20 + 20;
static int ip_rt_min_advmss __read_mostly = 256;
+static int ip_min_valid_pmtu __read_mostly = IPV4_MIN_MTU;
+
/*
* Interface to generic destination cache.
*/
@@ -2629,7 +2631,8 @@ static struct ctl_table ipv4_route_table
.data = &ip_rt_min_pmtu,
.maxlen = sizeof(int),
.mode = 0644,
- .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
+ .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
+ .extra1 = &ip_min_valid_pmtu,
},
{
.procname = "min_adv_mss",
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from sd@queasysnail.net are
queue-3.18/net-ipv4-don-t-allow-setting-net.ipv4.route.min_pmtu-below-68.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-08 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1520535664145177@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jishi@redhat.com \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox