From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "drm/i915: Update watermark state correctly in sanitize_watermarks" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:41:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152086927255136@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915: Update watermark state correctly in sanitize_watermarks
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-update-watermark-state-correctly-in-sanitize_watermarks.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 556fe36d09da5f82879e92bafa0371b4b79f7d6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 12:34:53 +0100
Subject: drm/i915: Update watermark state correctly in sanitize_watermarks
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
commit 556fe36d09da5f82879e92bafa0371b4b79f7d6f upstream.
We no longer use intel_crtc->wm.active for watermarks any more,
which was incorrect. But this uncovered a bug in sanitize_watermarks(),
which meant that we wrote the correct watermarks, but the next
update would still use the wrong hw watermarks for calculating.
This caused all further updates to fail with -EINVAL and the
log would reveal an error like the one below:
[ 10.043902] [drm:ilk_validate_wm_level.part.8 [i915]] Sprite WM0 too large 56 (max 0)
[ 10.043960] [drm:ilk_validate_pipe_wm [i915]] LP0 watermark invalid
[ 10.044030] [drm:intel_crtc_atomic_check [i915]] No valid intermediate pipe watermarks are possible
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Fixes: b6b178a77210 ("drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org #v4.8+
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171110113503.16253-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -14498,6 +14498,8 @@ retry:
cs->wm.need_postvbl_update = true;
dev_priv->display.optimize_watermarks(intel_state, cs);
+
+ to_intel_crtc_state(crtc->state)->wm = cs->wm;
}
put_state:
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com are
queue-4.14/drm-i915-update-watermark-state-correctly-in-sanitize_watermarks.patch
queue-4.14/drm-i915-always-call-to-intel_display_set_init_power-in-resume_early.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 15:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152086927255136@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox