From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: arnd@arndb.de, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jgg@mellanox.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "IB/mlx5: revisit -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:15:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152120971840183@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
IB/mlx5: revisit -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ib-mlx5-revisit-wmaybe-uninitialized-warning.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Mar 16 15:11:08 CET 2018
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:45:44 +0100
Subject: IB/mlx5: revisit -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
[ Upstream commit 1b19b95169cd52fe82cd442fec0b279fe25cc838 ]
A warning that I thought I had fixed before occasionally comes
back in rare randconfig builds (I found 7 instances in the last
100000 builds, originally it was much more frequent):
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c: In function 'mlx5_ib_reg_user_mr':
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c:1229:5: error: 'order' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
if (order <= mr_cache_max_order(dev)) {
^
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c:1247:8: error: 'ncont' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c:1247:8: error: 'page_shift' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c:1260:2: error: 'npages' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
I've looked at all those findings again and noticed that they are all
with CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_MEM=n, which means ib_umem_get() returns
an error unconditionally and we never initialize or use those variables.
This triggers a condition in gcc iff mr_umem_get() is partially but not
entirely inlined, which in turn depends on the exact combination of
optimization settings. This is a known problem with gcc, with no
easy solution in the compiler, so this adds another workaround that
should be more reliable than my previous attempt.
Returning an error from mlx5_ib_reg_user_mr() earlier means that we
can completely bypass the logic that caused the warning, the compiler
can now see that the variable is never accessed.
Fixes: 14ab8896f5d9 ("IB/mlx5: avoid bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
@@ -1206,6 +1206,9 @@ struct ib_mr *mlx5_ib_reg_user_mr(struct
int err;
bool use_umr = true;
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INFINIBAND_USER_MEM))
+ return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+
mlx5_ib_dbg(dev, "start 0x%llx, virt_addr 0x%llx, length 0x%llx, access_flags 0x%x\n",
start, virt_addr, length, access_flags);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from arnd@arndb.de are
queue-4.15/ib-mlx5-revisit-wmaybe-uninitialized-warning.patch
queue-4.15/drm-vblank-fix-vblank-timestamp-debugs.patch
queue-4.15/earlycon-add-reg-offset-to-physical-address-before-mapping.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-16 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152120971840183@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).