From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race" has been added to the 4.14-stable tree
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:45:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <152121151276154@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race
to the 4.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
cpufreq-fix-governor-module-removal-race.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Fri Mar 16 15:43:17 CET 2018
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:27:07 +0100
Subject: cpufreq: Fix governor module removal race
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
[ Upstream commit a8b149d32b663c1a4105273295184b78f53d33cf ]
It is possible to remove a cpufreq governor module after
cpufreq_parse_governor() has returned success in
store_scaling_governor() and before cpufreq_set_policy()
acquires a reference to it, because the governor list is
not protected during that period and nothing prevents the
governor from being unregistered then.
Prevent that from happening by acquiring an extra reference
to the governor module temporarily in cpufreq_parse_governor(),
under cpufreq_governor_mutex, and dropping it in
store_scaling_governor(), when cpufreq_set_policy() returns.
Note that the second cpufreq_parse_governor() call site is fine,
because it only cares about the policy member of new_policy.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -631,6 +631,8 @@ static int cpufreq_parse_governor(char *
*governor = t;
err = 0;
}
+ if (t && !try_module_get(t->owner))
+ t = NULL;
mutex_unlock(&cpufreq_governor_mutex);
}
@@ -759,6 +761,10 @@ static ssize_t store_scaling_governor(st
return -EINVAL;
ret = cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
+
+ if (new_policy.governor)
+ module_put(new_policy.governor->owner);
+
return ret ? ret : count;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com are
queue-4.14/cpufreq-fix-governor-module-removal-race.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-03-16 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=152121151276154@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).