stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hdegoede@redhat.com, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "genirq: Use irqd_get_trigger_type to compare the trigger type for shared IRQs" has been added to the 3.18-stable tree
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:17:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152172826135119@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    genirq: Use irqd_get_trigger_type to compare the trigger type for shared IRQs

to the 3.18-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     genirq-use-irqd_get_trigger_type-to-compare-the-trigger-type-for-shared-irqs.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.18 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Thu Mar 22 15:16:04 CET 2018
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2017 12:08:31 +0200
Subject: genirq: Use irqd_get_trigger_type to compare the trigger type for shared IRQs

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>


[ Upstream commit 382bd4de61827dbaaf5fb4fb7b1f4be4a86505e7 ]

When requesting a shared irq with IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE then the irqaction
flags get filled with the trigger type from the irq_data:

        if (!(new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK))
                new->flags |= irqd_get_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data);

On the first setup_irq() the trigger type in irq_data is NONE when the
above code executes, then the irq is started up for the first time and
then the actual trigger type gets established, but that's too late to fix
up new->flags.

When then a second user of the irq requests the irq with IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE
its irqaction's triggertype gets set to the actual trigger type and the
following check fails:

        if (!((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK))

Resulting in the request_irq failing with -EBUSY even though both
users requested the irq with IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_TRIGGER_NONE

Fix this by comparing the new irqaction's trigger type to the trigger type
stored in the irq_data which correctly reflects the actual trigger type
being used for the irq.

Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170415100831.17073-1-hdegoede@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/irq/manage.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1058,8 +1058,10 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq
 		 * set the trigger type must match. Also all must
 		 * agree on ONESHOT.
 		 */
+		unsigned int oldtype = irqd_get_trigger_type(&desc->irq_data);
+
 		if (!((old->flags & new->flags) & IRQF_SHARED) ||
-		    ((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK) ||
+		    (oldtype != (new->flags & IRQF_TRIGGER_MASK)) ||
 		    ((old->flags ^ new->flags) & IRQF_ONESHOT))
 			goto mismatch;
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from hdegoede@redhat.com are

queue-3.18/genirq-use-irqd_get_trigger_type-to-compare-the-trigger-type-for-shared-irqs.patch
queue-3.18/x86-i8259-export-legacy_pic-symbol.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-03-22 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152172826135119@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).