* Patch "nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
@ 2018-03-25 9:42 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2018-03-25 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jlayton, bfields, fsorenso, gregkh; +Cc: stable, stable-commits
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown
to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfsd-remove-blocked-locks-on-client-teardown.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 68ef3bc3166468678d5e1fdd216628c35bd1186f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:32:02 -0400
Subject: nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
commit 68ef3bc3166468678d5e1fdd216628c35bd1186f upstream.
We had some reports of panics in nfsd4_lm_notify, and that showed a
nfs4_lockowner that had outlived its so_client.
Ensure that we walk any leftover lockowners after tearing down all of
the stateids, and remove any blocked locks that they hold.
With this change, we also don't need to walk the nbl_lru on nfsd_net
shutdown, as that will happen naturally when we tear down the clients.
Fixes: 76d348fadff5 (nfsd: have nfsd4_lock use blocking locks for v4.1+ locks)
Reported-by: Frank Sorenson <fsorenso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -268,6 +268,35 @@ free_blocked_lock(struct nfsd4_blocked_l
kfree(nbl);
}
+static void
+remove_blocked_locks(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo)
+{
+ struct nfs4_client *clp = lo->lo_owner.so_client;
+ struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(clp->net, nfsd_net_id);
+ struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
+ LIST_HEAD(reaplist);
+
+ /* Dequeue all blocked locks */
+ spin_lock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
+ while (!list_empty(&lo->lo_blocked)) {
+ nbl = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_blocked,
+ struct nfsd4_blocked_lock,
+ nbl_list);
+ list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_list);
+ list_move(&nbl->nbl_lru, &reaplist);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
+
+ /* Now free them */
+ while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
+ nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist, struct nfsd4_blocked_lock,
+ nbl_lru);
+ list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
+ posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
+ free_blocked_lock(nbl);
+ }
+}
+
static int
nfsd4_cb_notify_lock_done(struct nfsd4_callback *cb, struct rpc_task *task)
{
@@ -1866,6 +1895,7 @@ static __be32 mark_client_expired_locked
static void
__destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp)
{
+ int i;
struct nfs4_openowner *oo;
struct nfs4_delegation *dp;
struct list_head reaplist;
@@ -1895,6 +1925,16 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp
nfs4_get_stateowner(&oo->oo_owner);
release_openowner(oo);
}
+ for (i = 0; i < OWNER_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
+ struct nfs4_stateowner *so, *tmp;
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(so, tmp, &clp->cl_ownerstr_hashtbl[i],
+ so_strhash) {
+ /* Should be no openowners at this point */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(so->so_is_open_owner);
+ remove_blocked_locks(lockowner(so));
+ }
+ }
nfsd4_return_all_client_layouts(clp);
nfsd4_shutdown_callback(clp);
if (clp->cl_cb_conn.cb_xprt)
@@ -6358,6 +6398,7 @@ nfsd4_release_lockowner(struct svc_rqst
}
spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
free_ol_stateid_reaplist(&reaplist);
+ remove_blocked_locks(lo);
nfs4_put_stateowner(&lo->lo_owner);
return status;
@@ -7143,6 +7184,8 @@ nfs4_state_destroy_net(struct net *net)
}
}
+ WARN_ON(!list_empty(&nn->blocked_locks_lru));
+
for (i = 0; i < CLIENT_HASH_SIZE; i++) {
while (!list_empty(&nn->unconf_id_hashtbl[i])) {
clp = list_entry(nn->unconf_id_hashtbl[i].next, struct nfs4_client, cl_idhash);
@@ -7209,7 +7252,6 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
struct nfs4_delegation *dp = NULL;
struct list_head *pos, *next, reaplist;
struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
- struct nfsd4_blocked_lock *nbl;
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&nn->laundromat_work);
locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
@@ -7230,24 +7272,6 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid);
}
- BUG_ON(!list_empty(&reaplist));
- spin_lock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
- while (!list_empty(&nn->blocked_locks_lru)) {
- nbl = list_first_entry(&nn->blocked_locks_lru,
- struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
- list_move(&nbl->nbl_lru, &reaplist);
- list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_list);
- }
- spin_unlock(&nn->blocked_locks_lock);
-
- while (!list_empty(&reaplist)) {
- nbl = list_first_entry(&reaplist,
- struct nfsd4_blocked_lock, nbl_lru);
- list_del_init(&nbl->nbl_lru);
- posix_unblock_lock(&nbl->nbl_lock);
- free_blocked_lock(nbl);
- }
-
nfsd4_client_tracking_exit(net);
nfs4_state_destroy_net(net);
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jlayton@redhat.com are
queue-4.15/nfsd-remove-blocked-locks-on-client-teardown.patch
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-03-25 9:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-03-25 9:42 Patch "nfsd: remove blocked locks on client teardown" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).