stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: lukas@wunner.de, alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hdegoede@redhat.com,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, loic.poulain@linaro.org,
	marcel@holtmann.org, u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 11:36:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <152326656861254@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO

to the 4.15-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     bluetooth-hci_bcm-mandate-presence-of-shutdown-and-device-wake-gpio.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.15 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Apr  9 10:16:32 CEST 2018
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:32:10 +0100
Subject: Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO

From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>


[ Upstream commit 3e81a4ca51a1172253078ca7abd6a91040b8fcf4 ]

Commit 0395ffc1ee05 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add PM for BCM devices")
amended this driver to request a shutdown and device wake GPIO on probe,
but mandated that only one of them need to be present:

	/* Make sure at-least one of the GPIO is defined and that
	 * a name is specified for this instance
	 */
	if ((!dev->device_wakeup && !dev->shutdown) || !dev->name) {
		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid platform data\n");
		return -EINVAL;
	}

However the same commit added a call to bcm_gpio_set_power() to the
->probe hook, which unconditionally accesses *both* GPIOs.  Luckily,
the resulting NULL pointer deref was never reported, suggesting there's
no machine where either GPIO is missing.

Commit 8a92056837fd ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Add (runtime)pm support to the
serdev driver") removed the check whether at least one of the GPIOs is
present without specifying a reason.

Because commit 62aaefa7d038 ("Bluetooth: hci_bcm: improve use of gpios
API") refactored the driver to use devm_gpiod_get_optional() instead of
devm_gpiod_get(), one is now tempted to believe that the driver doesn't
require *any* of the two GPIOs.

Which is wrong, the driver still requires both GPIOs to avoid a NULL
pointer deref.  To this end, establish the status quo ante and request
the GPIOs with devm_gpiod_get() again.  Bail out of ->probe if either
of them is missing.

Oddly enough, whereas bcm_gpio_set_power() accesses the device wake pin
unconditionally, bcm_suspend_device() and bcm_resume_device() do check
for its presence before accessing it.  Those checks are superfluous,
so remove them.

Cc: Frédéric Danis <frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com>
Cc: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c |   24 +++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c
@@ -577,11 +577,9 @@ static int bcm_suspend_device(struct dev
 	}
 
 	/* Suspend the device */
-	if (bdev->device_wakeup) {
-		gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, false);
-		bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "suspend, delaying 15 ms");
-		mdelay(15);
-	}
+	gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, false);
+	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "suspend, delaying 15 ms");
+	mdelay(15);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -592,11 +590,9 @@ static int bcm_resume_device(struct devi
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "");
 
-	if (bdev->device_wakeup) {
-		gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, true);
-		bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "resume, delaying 15 ms");
-		mdelay(15);
-	}
+	gpiod_set_value(bdev->device_wakeup, true);
+	bt_dev_dbg(bdev, "resume, delaying 15 ms");
+	mdelay(15);
 
 	/* When this executes, the device has woken up already */
 	if (bdev->is_suspended && bdev->hu) {
@@ -779,14 +775,12 @@ static int bcm_get_resources(struct bcm_
 
 	dev->clk = devm_clk_get(dev->dev, NULL);
 
-	dev->device_wakeup = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev,
-						     "device-wakeup",
-						     GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	dev->device_wakeup = devm_gpiod_get(dev->dev, "device-wakeup",
+					    GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->device_wakeup))
 		return PTR_ERR(dev->device_wakeup);
 
-	dev->shutdown = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev->dev, "shutdown",
-						GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
+	dev->shutdown = devm_gpiod_get(dev->dev, "shutdown", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev->shutdown))
 		return PTR_ERR(dev->shutdown);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from lukas@wunner.de are

queue-4.15/bluetooth-hci_bcm-mandate-presence-of-shutdown-and-device-wake-gpio.patch
queue-4.15/bluetooth-hci_bcm-validate-irq-before-using-it.patch

             reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09  9:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-09  9:36 gregkh [this message]
2018-04-09 10:09 ` Patch "Bluetooth: hci_bcm: Mandate presence of shutdown and device wake GPIO" has been added to the 4.15-stable tree Lukas Wunner
2018-04-09 11:52   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=152326656861254@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
    --cc=lukas@wunner.de \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).