stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	alexander.levin@microsoft.com,
	alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jolsa@kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	vince@deater.net
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "perf/core: Correct event creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 21:59:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523303952214170@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    perf/core: Correct event creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     perf-core-correct-event-creation-with-perf_format_group.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Apr  9 17:09:24 CEST 2018
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 11:45:12 +0200
Subject: perf/core: Correct event creation with PERF_FORMAT_GROUP

From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>


[ Upstream commit ba5213ae6b88fb170c4771fef6553f759c7d8cdd ]

Andi was asking about PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events, which led
to the discovery of a bug from commit:

  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")

 -       PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP                       = 1U << 4,
 +       PERF_SAMPLE_READ                        = 1U << 4,

 -       if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_GROUP))
 +       if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP))

is a clear fail :/

While this changes user visible behaviour; it was previously possible
to create an inherited event with PERF_SAMPLE_READ; this is deemed
acceptible because its results were always incorrect.

Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>
Fixes:  3dab77fb1bf8 ("perf: Rework/fix the whole read vs group stuff")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170530094512.dy2nljns2uq7qa3j@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/events/core.c |   15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -5669,9 +5669,6 @@ static void perf_output_read_one(struct
 	__output_copy(handle, values, n * sizeof(u64));
 }
 
-/*
- * XXX PERF_FORMAT_GROUP vs inherited events seems difficult.
- */
 static void perf_output_read_group(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			    struct perf_event *event,
 			    u64 enabled, u64 running)
@@ -5716,6 +5713,13 @@ static void perf_output_read_group(struc
 #define PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIMES (PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_ENABLED|\
 				 PERF_FORMAT_TOTAL_TIME_RUNNING)
 
+/*
+ * XXX PERF_SAMPLE_READ vs inherited events seems difficult.
+ *
+ * The problem is that its both hard and excessively expensive to iterate the
+ * child list, not to mention that its impossible to IPI the children running
+ * on another CPU, from interrupt/NMI context.
+ */
 static void perf_output_read(struct perf_output_handle *handle,
 			     struct perf_event *event)
 {
@@ -9259,9 +9263,10 @@ perf_event_alloc(struct perf_event_attr
 	local64_set(&hwc->period_left, hwc->sample_period);
 
 	/*
-	 * we currently do not support PERF_FORMAT_GROUP on inherited events
+	 * We currently do not support PERF_SAMPLE_READ on inherited events.
+	 * See perf_output_read().
 	 */
-	if (attr->inherit && (attr->read_format & PERF_FORMAT_GROUP))
+	if (attr->inherit && (attr->sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_READ))
 		goto err_ns;
 
 	if (!has_branch_stack(event))


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from peterz@infradead.org are

queue-4.9/perf-callchain-force-user_ds-when-invoking-perf_callchain_user.patch
queue-4.9/perf-report-fix-off-by-one-for-non-activation-frames.patch
queue-4.9/x86-efi-disable-runtime-services-on-kexec-kernel-if-booted-with-efi-old_map.patch
queue-4.9/perf-tools-fix-copyfile_offset-update-of-output-offset.patch
queue-4.9/sched-numa-use-down_read_trylock-for-the-mmap_sem.patch
queue-4.9/x86-asm-don-t-use-rbp-as-a-temporary-register-in-csum_partial_copy_generic.patch
queue-4.9/perf-core-correct-event-creation-with-perf_format_group.patch
queue-4.9/x86-mm-kaslr-use-the-_asm_mul-macro-for-multiplication-to-work-around-clang-incompatibility.patch
queue-4.9/x86-tsc-provide-tsc-unstable-boot-parameter.patch
queue-4.9/x86-boot-declare-error-as-noreturn.patch
queue-4.9/cpuhotplug-link-lock-stacks-for-hotplug-callbacks.patch
queue-4.9/perf-core-fix-error-handling-in-perf_event_alloc.patch
queue-4.9/sched-deadline-use-the-revised-wakeup-rule-for-suspending-constrained-dl-tasks.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-04-09 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1523303952214170@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.levin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).