Patch "rtc: opal: Handle disabled TPO in opal_get_tpo_time()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

Patch "rtc: opal: Handle disabled TPO in opal_get_tpo_time()" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[gregkh]

This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    rtc: opal: Handle disabled TPO in opal_get_tpo_time()

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     rtc-opal-handle-disabled-tpo-in-opal_get_tpo_time.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Mon Apr  9 17:09:24 CEST 2018
From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 15:35:09 +0530
Subject: rtc: opal: Handle disabled TPO in opal_get_tpo_time()

From: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


[ Upstream commit 6dc1cf6f932bb0ea4d8f5e913a0a401ecacd2f03 ]

On PowerNV platform when Timed-Power-On(TPO) is disabled, read of
stored TPO yields value with all date components set to '0' inside
opal_get_tpo_time(). The function opal_to_tm() then converts it to an
offset from year 1900 yielding alarm-time == "1900-00-01
00:00:00". This causes problems with __rtc_read_alarm() that
expecting an offset from "1970-00-01 00:00:00" and returned alarm-time
results in a -ve value for time64_t. Which ultimately results in this
error reported in kernel logs with a seemingly garbage value:

"rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: -2-1--1041528741
2005511117:71582844:32"

We fix this by explicitly handling the case of all alarm date-time
components being '0' inside opal_get_tpo_time() and returning -ENOENT
in such a case. This signals generic rtc that no alarm is set and it
bails out from the alarm initialization flow without reporting the
above error.

Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Jain <vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reported-by: Steve Best <sbest@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-opal.c
@@ -150,6 +150,16 @@ static int opal_get_tpo_time(struct devi
 
 	y_m_d = be32_to_cpu(__y_m_d);
 	h_m_s_ms = ((u64)be32_to_cpu(__h_m) << 32);
+
+	/* check if no alarm is set */
+	if (y_m_d == 0 && h_m_s_ms == 0) {
+		pr_debug("No alarm is set\n");
+		rc = -ENOENT;
+		goto exit;
+	} else {
+		pr_debug("Alarm set to %x %llx\n", y_m_d, h_m_s_ms);
+	}
+
 	opal_to_tm(y_m_d, h_m_s_ms, &alarm->time);
 
 exit:


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from vaibhav@linux.vnet.ibm.com are

queue-4.9/rtc-interface-validate-alarm-time-before-handling-rollover.patch
queue-4.9/rtc-opal-handle-disabled-tpo-in-opal_get_tpo_time.patch