* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers" failed to apply to 4.16-stable tree
@ 2018-04-22 9:19 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2018-04-22 9:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: chris, joonas.lahtinen, stable, tvrtko.ursulin, tvrtko.ursulin; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.16-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From fd10e2ce9905030d922e179a8047a4d50daffd8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2018 09:46:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers
When a request is preempted, it is unsubmitted from the HW queue and
removed from the active list of breadcrumbs. In the process, this
however triggers the signaler and it may see the clear rbtree with the
old, and still valid, seqno, or it may match the cleared seqno with the
now zero rq->global_seqno. This confuses the signaler into action and
signaling the fence.
Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.12+
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180206094633.30181-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
index efbc627a2a25..b955f7d7bd0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -588,29 +588,16 @@ void intel_engine_remove_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
}
-static bool signal_valid(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
-{
- return intel_wait_check_request(&request->signaling.wait, request);
-}
-
static bool signal_complete(const struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
{
if (!request)
return false;
- /* If another process served as the bottom-half it may have already
- * signalled that this wait is already completed.
- */
- if (intel_wait_complete(&request->signaling.wait))
- return signal_valid(request);
-
- /* Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
+ /*
+ * Carefully check if the request is complete, giving time for the
* seqno to be visible or if the GPU hung.
*/
- if (__i915_request_irq_complete(request))
- return true;
-
- return false;
+ return __i915_request_irq_complete(request);
}
static struct drm_i915_gem_request *to_signaler(struct rb_node *rb)
@@ -712,6 +699,7 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(void *arg)
&request->fence.flags)) {
local_bh_disable();
dma_fence_signal(&request->fence);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_request_completed(request));
local_bh_enable(); /* kick start the tasklets */
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-04-22 9:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-22 9:19 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915/breadcrumbs: Ignore unsubmitted signalers" failed to apply to 4.16-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).