* [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
@ 2018-05-11 0:54 Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-11 18:03 ` Souza, Jose
2018-05-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tarun Vyas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-05-11 0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan, stable, Ville Syrjälä,
Jose Roberto de Souza
Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware of
any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in enabling
PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by the
hardware.
I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and 1.4a.
Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8 psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
+ PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
--
2.14.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
2018-05-11 0:54 [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table Dhinakaran Pandiyan
@ 2018-05-11 18:03 ` Souza, Jose
2018-05-11 19:46 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tarun Vyas
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Souza, Jose @ 2018-05-11 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Pandiyan, Dhinakaran
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 17:54 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware
> of
> any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in
> enabling
> PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by
> the
> hardware.
It should be 'a lower setup time'.
Sink sets 2h requesting 220us but source will only wait 165us.
Other than that looks good:
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>
> I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and
> 1.4a.
>
> Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8
> psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
> + PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
2018-05-11 18:03 ` Souza, Jose
@ 2018-05-11 19:46 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dhinakaran Pandiyan @ 2018-05-11 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Souza, Jose, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
DRI Development
On Fri, 2018-05-11 at 18:03 +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-05-10 at 17:54 -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> >
> > Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not
> > aware
> > of
> > any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in
> > enabling
> > PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported
> > by
> > the
> > hardware.
> It should be 'a lower setup time'.
> Sink sets 2h requesting 220us but source will only wait 165us.
By hardware, I meant source :) We'll end up enabling PSR on a sink with
a higher setup time requirement (220us) than supported by the source
hardware (let's say 200 us) because we read the sink requirement as 165
us.
>
> Other than that looks good:
> Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
>
Thanks!
I'll resend this along the other PSR patch you reviewed.
> >
> >
> > I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and
> > 1.4a.
> >
> > Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8
> > psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> > static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
> > PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
> > PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
> > + PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
> > PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
> > PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
> > PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table.
2018-05-11 0:54 [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-11 18:03 ` Souza, Jose
@ 2018-05-18 17:45 ` Tarun Vyas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Tarun Vyas @ 2018-05-18 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dhinakaran Pandiyan; +Cc: intel-gfx, stable
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 05:54:19PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
> Entry corresponding to 220 us setup time was missing. I am not aware of
> any specific bug this fixes, but this could potentially result in enabling
> PSR on a panel with a higher setup time requirement than supported by the
> hardware.
>
> I verified the value is present in eDP spec versions 1.3, 1.4 and 1.4a.
>
> Fixes: 6608804b3d7f ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_psr_setup_time()")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Ville Syrj�l� <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jose Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 36c7609a4bd5..a7ba602a43a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -1159,6 +1159,7 @@ int drm_dp_psr_setup_time(const u8 psr_cap[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE])
> static const u16 psr_setup_time_us[] = {
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(330),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(275),
> + PSR_SETUP_TIME(220),
Verified the PSR set up time table in the eDP 1.4b spec
Reviewed-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(165),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(110),
> PSR_SETUP_TIME(55),
> --
> 2.14.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-18 17:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-05-11 0:54 [PATCH] drm/psr: Fix missed entry in PSR setup time table Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-11 18:03 ` Souza, Jose
2018-05-11 19:46 ` Dhinakaran Pandiyan
2018-05-18 17:45 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tarun Vyas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).