From: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>, <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fix return value check for bad block status
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 14:32:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1528880556-20348-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org> (raw)
Positive return value from read_oob() is making false BAD
blocks. For some of the NAND controllers, OOB bytes will be
protected with ECC and read_oob() will return number of bitflips.
If there is any bitflip in ECC protected OOB bytes for BAD block
status page, then that block is getting treated as BAD.
Fixes: c120e75e0e7d ("mtd: nand: use read_oob() instead of cmdfunc() for bad block check")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
index f28c3a5..4a73f73 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/nand_base.c
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static int nand_block_bad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
for (; page < page_end; page++) {
res = chip->ecc.read_oob(mtd, chip, page);
- if (res)
+ if (res < 0)
return res;
bad = chip->oob_poi[chip->badblockpos];
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-13 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-13 9:02 Abhishek Sahu [this message]
2018-06-18 13:57 ` [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: fix return value check for bad block status Miquel Raynal
2018-06-22 11:34 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1528880556-20348-1-git-send-email-absahu@codeaurora.org \
--to=absahu@codeaurora.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@bootlin.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).