From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: alexander.deucher@amd.com, christian.koenig@amd.com, kugel@rockbox.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/amdgpu/pp/smu7: use a local variable for toc indexing" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 18:35:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532277345191249@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 02ce6ce2e1d07e31e8314c761a2caa087ea094ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:38:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/pp/smu7: use a local variable for toc indexing
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Rather than using the index variable stored in vram. If
the device fails to come back online after a resume cycle,
reads from vram will return all 1s which will cause a
segfault. Based on a patch from Thomas Martitz <kugel@rockbox.org>.
This avoids the segfault, but we still need to sort out
why the GPU does not come back online after a resume.
Bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105760
Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
index d644a9bb9078..9f407c48d4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smumgr/smu7_smumgr.c
@@ -381,6 +381,7 @@ int smu7_request_smu_load_fw(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
uint32_t fw_to_load;
int result = 0;
struct SMU_DRAMData_TOC *toc;
+ uint32_t num_entries = 0;
if (!hwmgr->reload_fw) {
pr_info("skip reloading...\n");
@@ -422,41 +423,41 @@ int smu7_request_smu_load_fw(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
}
toc = (struct SMU_DRAMData_TOC *)smu_data->header;
- toc->num_entries = 0;
toc->structure_version = 1;
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_RLC_G, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_RLC_G, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_CE, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_CE, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_PFP, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_PFP, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_ME, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_ME, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_MEC, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_MEC, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT1, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT1, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_CP_MEC_JT2, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_SDMA0, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_SDMA0, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_SDMA1, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_SDMA1, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
if (!hwmgr->not_vf)
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == smu7_populate_single_firmware_entry(hwmgr,
- UCODE_ID_MEC_STORAGE, &toc->entry[toc->num_entries++]),
+ UCODE_ID_MEC_STORAGE, &toc->entry[num_entries++]),
"Failed to Get Firmware Entry.", return -EINVAL);
+ toc->num_entries = num_entries;
smu7_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_DRV_DRAM_ADDR_HI, upper_32_bits(smu_data->header_buffer.mc_addr));
smu7_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter(hwmgr, PPSMC_MSG_DRV_DRAM_ADDR_LO, lower_32_bits(smu_data->header_buffer.mc_addr));
reply other threads:[~2018-07-22 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532277345191249@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=kugel@rockbox.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).