public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix false negatives *and* false positives in" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 09:58:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532937514252178@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 44de022c4382541cebdd6de4465d1f4f465ff1dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 19:35:02 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix false negatives *and* false positives in
 ext4_check_descriptors()

Ext4_check_descriptors() was getting called before s_gdb_count was
initialized.  So for file systems w/o the meta_bg feature, allocation
bitmaps could overlap the block group descriptors and ext4 wouldn't
notice.

For file systems with the meta_bg feature enabled, there was a
fencepost error which would cause the ext4_check_descriptors() to
incorrectly believe that the block allocation bitmap overlaps with the
block group descriptor blocks, and it would reject the mount.

Fix both of these problems.

Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index ba2396a7bd04..eff5c983e067 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -2342,7 +2342,7 @@ static int ext4_check_descriptors(struct super_block *sb,
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
 	ext4_fsblk_t first_block = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
 	ext4_fsblk_t last_block;
-	ext4_fsblk_t last_bg_block = sb_block + ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, 0) + 1;
+	ext4_fsblk_t last_bg_block = sb_block + ext4_bg_num_gdb(sb, 0);
 	ext4_fsblk_t block_bitmap;
 	ext4_fsblk_t inode_bitmap;
 	ext4_fsblk_t inode_table;
@@ -4085,14 +4085,13 @@ static int ext4_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
 			goto failed_mount2;
 		}
 	}
+	sbi->s_gdb_count = db_count;
 	if (!ext4_check_descriptors(sb, logical_sb_block, &first_not_zeroed)) {
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "group descriptors corrupted!");
 		ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
 		goto failed_mount2;
 	}
 
-	sbi->s_gdb_count = db_count;
-
 	timer_setup(&sbi->s_err_report, print_daily_error_info, 0);
 
 	/* Register extent status tree shrinker */

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1532937514252178@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox