From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: dave.anglin@bell.net, deller@gmx.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] parisc: Remove unnecessary barriers from spinlock.h" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2018 13:29:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1534937348152134@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From 3b885ac1dc35b87a39ee176a6c7e2af9c789d8b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2018 16:31:17 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] parisc: Remove unnecessary barriers from spinlock.h
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Now that mb() is an instruction barrier, it will slow performance if we issue
unnecessary barriers.
The spinlock defines have a number of unnecessary barriers. The __ldcw()
define is both a hardware and compiler barrier. The mb() barriers in the
routines using __ldcw() serve no purpose.
The only barrier needed is the one in arch_spin_unlock(). We need to ensure
all accesses are complete prior to releasing the lock.
Signed-off-by: John David Anglin <dave.anglin@bell.net>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.0+
Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
diff --git a/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
index 6f84b6acc86e..8a63515f03bf 100644
--- a/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
+++ b/arch/parisc/include/asm/spinlock.h
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *x,
{
volatile unsigned int *a;
- mb();
a = __ldcw_align(x);
while (__ldcw(a) == 0)
while (*a == 0)
@@ -30,17 +29,16 @@ static inline void arch_spin_lock_flags(arch_spinlock_t *x,
local_irq_disable();
} else
cpu_relax();
- mb();
}
#define arch_spin_lock_flags arch_spin_lock_flags
static inline void arch_spin_unlock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
{
volatile unsigned int *a;
- mb();
+
a = __ldcw_align(x);
- *a = 1;
mb();
+ *a = 1;
}
static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
@@ -48,10 +46,8 @@ static inline int arch_spin_trylock(arch_spinlock_t *x)
volatile unsigned int *a;
int ret;
- mb();
a = __ldcw_align(x);
ret = __ldcw(a) != 0;
- mb();
return ret;
}
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-22 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-22 11:29 gregkh [this message]
2018-08-22 12:55 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] parisc: Remove unnecessary barriers from spinlock.h" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree Helge Deller
2018-08-22 13:37 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1534937348152134@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dave.anglin@bell.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox