From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ethanlien@synology.com, dsterba@suse.com, nborisov@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:45:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <153556110940203@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From d814a49198eafa6163698bdd93961302f3a877a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:44:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes
We use customized, nodesize batch value to update dirty_metadata_bytes.
We should also use batch version of compare function or we will easily
goto fast path and get false result from percpu_counter_compare().
Fixes: e2d845211eda ("Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 6023eed3e805..e3858b2fe014 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -959,8 +959,9 @@ static int btree_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info;
/* this is a bit racy, but that's ok */
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret < 0)
return 0;
}
@@ -4134,8 +4135,9 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (flush_delayed)
btrfs_balance_delayed_items(fs_info);
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret > 0) {
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
}
next reply other threads:[~2018-08-29 20:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-29 16:45 gregkh [this message]
2018-09-03 10:26 ` [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=153556110940203@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ethanlien@synology.com \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).