* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
@ 2018-08-29 16:45 gregkh
2018-09-03 10:26 ` [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes Nikolay Borisov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2018-08-29 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ethanlien, dsterba, nborisov; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From d814a49198eafa6163698bdd93961302f3a877a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 15:44:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes
We use customized, nodesize batch value to update dirty_metadata_bytes.
We should also use batch version of compare function or we will easily
goto fast path and get false result from percpu_counter_compare().
Fixes: e2d845211eda ("Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 6023eed3e805..e3858b2fe014 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -959,8 +959,9 @@ static int btree_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info;
/* this is a bit racy, but that's ok */
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret < 0)
return 0;
}
@@ -4134,8 +4135,9 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
if (flush_delayed)
btrfs_balance_delayed_items(fs_info);
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret > 0) {
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes
2018-08-29 16:45 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree gregkh
@ 2018-09-03 10:26 ` Nikolay Borisov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2018-09-03 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: stable; +Cc: Ethan Lien, David Sterba, Nikolay Borisov
From: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
We use customized, nodesize batch value to update dirty_metadata_bytes.
We should also use batch version of compare function or we will easily
goto fast path and get false result from percpu_counter_compare().
Fixes: e2d845211eda ("Btrfs: use percpu counter for dirty metadata count")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Ethan Lien <ethanlien@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[nb: Rebased on 4.4.y ]
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
Hello Greg,
Here is a working backport for 4.4.y of upstream commit:
d814a49198eafa6163698bdd93961302f3a877a4
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index d106b981d86f..ae6e3a30e61e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1011,8 +1011,9 @@ static int btree_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
fs_info = BTRFS_I(mapping->host)->root->fs_info;
/* this is a bit racy, but that's ok */
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret < 0)
return 0;
}
@@ -3987,8 +3988,9 @@ static void __btrfs_btree_balance_dirty(struct btrfs_root *root,
if (flush_delayed)
btrfs_balance_delayed_items(root);
- ret = percpu_counter_compare(&root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
- BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH);
+ ret = __percpu_counter_compare(&root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes,
+ BTRFS_DIRTY_METADATA_THRESH,
+ root->fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch);
if (ret > 0) {
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited(
root->fs_info->btree_inode->i_mapping);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-09-03 14:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-29 16:45 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree gregkh
2018-09-03 10:26 ` [PATCH] btrfs: use correct compare function of dirty_metadata_bytes Nikolay Borisov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).