FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: VMX: hide flexpriority from guest when disabled at the" failed to apply to 4.18-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: VMX: hide flexpriority from guest when disabled at the" failed to apply to 4.18-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.18-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 2cf7ea9f40fabee0f8b40db4eb2d1e85cc6c0a95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:34:00 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: hide flexpriority from guest when disabled at the
 module level

As of commit 8d860bbeedef ("kvm: vmx: Basic APIC virtualization controls
have three settings"), KVM will disable VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES when
a nested guest writes APIC_BASE MSR and kvm-intel.flexpriority=0,
whereas previously KVM would allow a nested guest to enable
VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES so long as it's supported in hardware.  That is,
KVM now advertises VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES to a guest but doesn't
(always) allow setting it when kvm-intel.flexpriority=0, and may even
initially allow the control and then clear it when the nested guest
writes APIC_BASE MSR, which is decidedly odd even if it doesn't cause
functional issues.

Hide the control completely when the module parameter is cleared.

reported-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Fixes: 8d860bbeedef ("kvm: vmx: Basic APIC virtualization controls have three settings")
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 764ae031054f..55b62760b694 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -3589,12 +3589,12 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, bool apicv)
 		msrs->secondary_ctls_high);
 	msrs->secondary_ctls_low = 0;
 	msrs->secondary_ctls_high &=
-		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_DESC |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
 		SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING;
+
 	/*
 	 * We can emulate "VMCS shadowing," even if the hardware
 	 * doesn't support it.
@@ -3651,6 +3651,10 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct nested_vmx_msrs *msrs, bool apicv)
 		msrs->secondary_ctls_high |=
 			SECONDARY_EXEC_UNRESTRICTED_GUEST;
 
+	if (flexpriority_enabled)
+		msrs->secondary_ctls_high |=
+			SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
+
 	/* miscellaneous data */
 	rdmsr(MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC,
 		msrs->misc_low,