* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via" failed to apply to 5.1-stable tree
@ 2019-06-04 8:55 gregkh
2019-06-04 9:18 ` [PATCH for 5.1 and older] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID Christian Borntraeger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: gregkh @ 2019-06-04 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thuth, borntraeger, cohuck, david, drjones; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:43:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all
architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined
during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code
is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA
structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu()
function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard-
ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use.
Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too.
So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common
code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return
the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest.
With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index 6d0517ac18e5..0369f26ab96d 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_MIPS_FPU:
/* We don't handle systems with inconsistent cpu_has_fpu */
r = !!raw_cpu_has_fpu;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 3393b166817a..aa3a678711be 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
case KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO:
r = 1;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e5e8eb29e68e..28ebd647784c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
r = KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS;
if (!kvm_s390_use_sca_entries())
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index acb179f78fdc..83aefd759846 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3122,6 +3122,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_PV_MMU: /* obsolete */
r = 0;
break;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 90cedebaeb94..7eeebe5e9da2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID:
if (!kvm)
r = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 301089a462c4..ca54b09adf5b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3151,8 +3151,6 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
case KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE:
return KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM;
#endif
- case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
- return KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
return KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
default:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH for 5.1 and older] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
2019-06-04 8:55 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via" failed to apply to 5.1-stable tree gregkh
@ 2019-06-04 9:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2019-06-04 11:46 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christian Borntraeger @ 2019-06-04 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh
Cc: stable, Thomas Huth, Andrew Jones, Cornelia Huck,
David Hildenbrand, Christian Borntraeger
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all
architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined
during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code
is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA
structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu()
function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard-
ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use.
Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too.
So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common
code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return
the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest.
With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
[backport to 5.1 and older]
---
arch/mips/kvm/mips.c | 3 +++
arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c | 3 +++
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 3 +++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 --
6 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index 6d0517ac18e50..0369f26ab96d6 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_MIPS_FPU:
/* We don't handle systems with inconsistent cpu_has_fpu */
r = !!raw_cpu_has_fpu;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 8885377ec3e0c..d2e800e27f036 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -650,6 +650,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
case KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO:
r = 1;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 4638303ba6a85..c4180ecfbb2a4 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
r = KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS;
if (!kvm_s390_use_sca_entries())
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6b8575c547eed..efc8adf7ca0e0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3090,6 +3090,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
break;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index f412ebc906100..8e2a5eb38bc07 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
r = KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
break;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 2b2a460c62520..48c549a884869 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3062,8 +3062,6 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
case KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE:
return KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM;
#endif
- case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
- return KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
default:
break;
}
--
2.21.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for 5.1 and older] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
2019-06-04 9:18 ` [PATCH for 5.1 and older] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID Christian Borntraeger
@ 2019-06-04 11:46 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2019-06-04 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Borntraeger
Cc: stable, Thomas Huth, Andrew Jones, Cornelia Huck,
David Hildenbrand
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 11:18:28AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>
> KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all
> architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined
> during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code
> is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA
> structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu()
> function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard-
> ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use.
> Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too.
> So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common
> code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return
> the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
> This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest.
> With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> [backport to 5.1 and older]
Now queued up, but next time, give me a hint and put the git sha1 id of
the commit in Linus's tree somewhere in here...
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-04 11:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-04 8:55 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via" failed to apply to 5.1-stable tree gregkh
2019-06-04 9:18 ` [PATCH for 5.1 and older] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID Christian Borntraeger
2019-06-04 11:46 ` Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).