* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
@ 2019-06-04 8:55 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2019-06-04 8:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thuth, borntraeger, cohuck, david, drjones; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a86cb413f4bf273a9d341a3ab2c2ca44e12eb317 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2019 18:43:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID
KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all
architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined
during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code
is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA
structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu()
function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard-
ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use.
Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too.
So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common
code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return
the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest.
With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
diff --git a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
index 6d0517ac18e5..0369f26ab96d 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kvm/mips.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_MIPS_FPU:
/* We don't handle systems with inconsistent cpu_has_fpu */
r = !!raw_cpu_has_fpu;
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
index 3393b166817a..aa3a678711be 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/powerpc.c
@@ -657,6 +657,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64
case KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO:
r = 1;
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index e5e8eb29e68e..28ebd647784c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -539,6 +539,7 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
break;
case KVM_CAP_NR_VCPUS:
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
r = KVM_S390_BSCA_CPU_SLOTS;
if (!kvm_s390_use_sca_entries())
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index acb179f78fdc..83aefd759846 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -3122,6 +3122,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_PV_MMU: /* obsolete */
r = 0;
break;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
index 90cedebaeb94..7eeebe5e9da2 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS:
r = KVM_MAX_VCPUS;
break;
+ case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
+ r = KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
+ break;
case KVM_CAP_MSI_DEVID:
if (!kvm)
r = -EINVAL;
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index 301089a462c4..ca54b09adf5b 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -3151,8 +3151,6 @@ static long kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension_generic(struct kvm *kvm, long arg)
case KVM_CAP_MULTI_ADDRESS_SPACE:
return KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM;
#endif
- case KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID:
- return KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID;
case KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS:
return KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS;
default:
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-06-04 8:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-04 8:55 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).