From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: james.morse@arm.com, bp@alien8.de, fenghua.yu@intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] x86/resctrl: Don't stop walking closids when a locksetup" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:44:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156076469820123@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 87d3aa28f345bea77c396855fa5d5fec4c24461f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:25:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: Don't stop walking closids when a locksetup
group is found
When a new control group is created __init_one_rdt_domain() walks all
the other closids to calculate the sets of used and unused bits.
If it discovers a pseudo_locksetup group, it breaks out of the loop. This
means any later closid doesn't get its used bits added to used_b. These
bits will then get set in unused_b, and added to the new control group's
configuration, even if they were marked as exclusive for a later closid.
When encountering a pseudo_locksetup group, we should continue. This is
because "a resource group enters 'pseudo-locked' mode after the schemata is
written while the resource group is in 'pseudo-locksetup' mode." When we
find a pseudo_locksetup group, its configuration is expected to be
overwritten, we can skip it.
Fixes: dfe9674b04ff6 ("x86/intel_rdt: Enable entering of pseudo-locksetup mode")
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H Peter Avin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190603172531.178830-1-james.morse@arm.com
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
index 333c177a2471..869cbef5da81 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
@@ -2542,7 +2542,12 @@ static int __init_one_rdt_domain(struct rdt_domain *d, struct rdt_resource *r,
if (closid_allocated(i) && i != closid) {
mode = rdtgroup_mode_by_closid(i);
if (mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP)
- break;
+ /*
+ * ctrl values for locksetup aren't relevant
+ * until the schemata is written, and the mode
+ * becomes RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKED.
+ */
+ continue;
/*
* If CDP is active include peer domain's
* usage to ensure there is no overlap
reply other threads:[~2019-06-17 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156076469820123@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).