From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: pbonzini@redhat.com, jan.kiszka@siemens.com, liran.alon@oracle.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset" failed to apply to 5.2-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:35:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1563878131859@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.2-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 88dddc11a8d6b09201b4db9d255b3394d9bc9e57 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:41:10 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: do not use dangling shadow VMCS after guest reset
If a KVM guest is reset while running a nested guest, free_nested will
disable the shadow VMCS execution control in the vmcs01. However,
on the next KVM_RUN vmx_vcpu_run would nevertheless try to sync
the VMCS12 to the shadow VMCS which has since been freed.
This causes a vmptrld of a NULL pointer on my machime, but Jan reports
the host to hang altogether. Let's see how much this trivial patch fixes.
Reported-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 4f23e34f628b..0f1378789bd0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ static void vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
{
secondary_exec_controls_clearbit(vmx, SECONDARY_EXEC_SHADOW_VMCS);
vmcs_write64(VMCS_LINK_POINTER, -1ull);
+ vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = false;
}
static inline void nested_release_evmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
@@ -1341,6 +1342,9 @@ static void copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
unsigned long val;
int i;
+ if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+ return;
+
preempt_disable();
vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
@@ -1373,6 +1377,9 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
unsigned long val;
int i, q;
+ if (WARN_ON(!shadow_vmcs))
+ return;
+
vmcs_load(shadow_vmcs);
for (q = 0; q < ARRAY_SIZE(fields); q++) {
@@ -4436,7 +4443,6 @@ static inline void nested_release_vmcs12(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* copy to memory all shadowed fields in case
they were modified */
copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(vmx);
- vmx->nested.need_vmcs12_to_shadow_sync = false;
vmx_disable_shadow_vmcs(vmx);
}
vmx->nested.posted_intr_nv = -1;
reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1563878131859@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).