stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: damien.lemoal@wdc.com, Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
	hans.holmberg@wdc.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix queue restart handling" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 15:40:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1570110048170134@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From cb8acabbe33b110157955a7425ee876fb81e6bbc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:40:20 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix queue restart handling

Commit 7211aef86f79 ("block: mq-deadline: Fix write completion
handling") added a call to blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx() in
dd_dispatch_request() to make sure that write request dispatching does
not stall when all target zones are locked. This fix left a subtle race
when a write completion happens during a dispatch execution on another
CPU:

CPU 0: Dispatch			CPU1: write completion

dd_dispatch_request()
    lock(&dd->lock);
    ...
    lock(&dd->zone_lock);	dd_finish_request()
    rq = find request		lock(&dd->zone_lock);
    unlock(&dd->zone_lock);
    				zone write unlock
				unlock(&dd->zone_lock);
				...
				__blk_mq_free_request
                                      check restart flag (not set)
				      -> queue not run
    ...
    if (!rq && have writes)
        blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx()
    unlock(&dd->lock)

Since the dispatch context finishes after the write request completion
handling, marking the queue as needing a restart is not seen from
__blk_mq_free_request() and blk_mq_sched_restart() not executed leading
to the dispatch stall under 100% write workloads.

Fix this by moving the call to blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx() from
dd_dispatch_request() into dd_finish_request() under the zone lock to
ensure full mutual exclusion between write request dispatch selection
and zone unlock on write request completion.

Fixes: 7211aef86f79 ("block: mq-deadline: Fix write completion handling")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Hans Holmberg <Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/block/mq-deadline.c b/block/mq-deadline.c
index 2a2a2e82832e..35e84bc0ec8c 100644
--- a/block/mq-deadline.c
+++ b/block/mq-deadline.c
@@ -377,13 +377,6 @@ static struct request *__dd_dispatch_request(struct deadline_data *dd)
  * hardware queue, but we may return a request that is for a
  * different hardware queue. This is because mq-deadline has shared
  * state for all hardware queues, in terms of sorting, FIFOs, etc.
- *
- * For a zoned block device, __dd_dispatch_request() may return NULL
- * if all the queued write requests are directed at zones that are already
- * locked due to on-going write requests. In this case, make sure to mark
- * the queue as needing a restart to ensure that the queue is run again
- * and the pending writes dispatched once the target zones for the ongoing
- * write requests are unlocked in dd_finish_request().
  */
 static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
@@ -392,9 +385,6 @@ static struct request *dd_dispatch_request(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 
 	spin_lock(&dd->lock);
 	rq = __dd_dispatch_request(dd);
-	if (!rq && blk_queue_is_zoned(hctx->queue) &&
-	    !list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]))
-		blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
 	spin_unlock(&dd->lock);
 
 	return rq;
@@ -561,6 +551,13 @@ static void dd_prepare_request(struct request *rq, struct bio *bio)
  * spinlock so that the zone is never unlocked while deadline_fifo_request()
  * or deadline_next_request() are executing. This function is called for
  * all requests, whether or not these requests complete successfully.
+ *
+ * For a zoned block device, __dd_dispatch_request() may have stopped
+ * dispatching requests if all the queued requests are write requests directed
+ * at zones that are already locked due to on-going write requests. To ensure
+ * write request dispatch progress in this case, mark the queue as needing a
+ * restart to ensure that the queue is run again after completion of the
+ * request and zones being unlocked.
  */
 static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 {
@@ -572,6 +569,8 @@ static void dd_finish_request(struct request *rq)
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
 		blk_req_zone_write_unlock(rq);
+		if (!list_empty(&dd->fifo_list[WRITE]))
+			blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(rq->mq_hctx);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dd->zone_lock, flags);
 	}
 }


             reply	other threads:[~2019-10-03 13:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-03 13:40 gregkh [this message]
2019-10-05  3:04 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] block: mq-deadline: Fix queue restart handling" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1570110048170134@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=Hans.Holmberg@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=damien.lemoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).