FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree

FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree

[gregkh]

The patch below does not apply to the 5.3-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 576f05865581f82ac988ffec70e4e2ebd31165db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:21:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through
 the GTT

Recently discovered in commit bdae33b8b82b ("drm/i915: Use maximum write
flush for pwrite_gtt") was that we needed to our full write barrier
before changing the GGTT PTE to ensure that our indirect writes through
the GTT landed before the PTE changed (and the writes end up in a
different page). That also applies to our GGTT relocation path.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730112151.5633-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index cbd7c6e3a1f8..4db4463089ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1014,11 +1014,12 @@ static void reloc_cache_reset(struct reloc_cache *cache)
 		kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
 		i915_gem_object_finish_access((struct drm_i915_gem_object *)cache->node.mm);
 	} else {
-		wmb();
+		struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
+
+		intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
 		io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __iomem *)vaddr);
-		if (cache->node.allocated) {
-			struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
 
+		if (cache->node.allocated) {
 			ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm,
 					     cache->node.start,
 					     cache->node.size);
@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void *reloc_iomap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	void *vaddr;
 
 	if (cache->vaddr) {
+		intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
 		io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __force __iomem *) unmask_page(cache->vaddr));
 	} else {
 		struct i915_vma *vma;
@@ -1114,7 +1116,6 @@ static void *reloc_iomap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 
 	offset = cache->node.start;
 	if (cache->node.allocated) {
-		wmb();
 		ggtt->vm.insert_page(&ggtt->vm,
 				     i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(obj, page),
 				     offset, I915_CACHE_NONE, 0);