From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hns@goldelico.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, robh@kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: WTF: patch "[PATCH] Documentation: dt: wireless: update wl1251 for sdio" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree?
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:06:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1576073178146235@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 5.4-stable tree.
I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst.
I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to
<stable@vger.kernel.org> and let me know why this patch should be
applied. Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 69167ae5a511560e6ae4181364da274b535a743f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@goldelico.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:30:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: wireless: update wl1251 for sdio
The standard method for sdio devices connected to
an sdio interface is to define them as a child node
like we can see with wlcore.
Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@goldelico.com>
Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.7+
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt
index bb2fcde6f7ff..f38950560982 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/ti,wl1251.txt
@@ -35,3 +35,29 @@ Examples:
ti,power-gpio = <&gpio3 23 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* 87 */
};
};
+
+&mmc3 {
+ vmmc-supply = <&wlan_en>;
+
+ bus-width = <4>;
+ non-removable;
+ ti,non-removable;
+ cap-power-off-card;
+
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ pinctrl-0 = <&mmc3_pins>;
+
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+
+ wlan: wifi@1 {
+ compatible = "ti,wl1251";
+
+ reg = <1>;
+
+ interrupt-parent = <&gpio1>;
+ interrupts = <21 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; /* GPIO_21 */
+
+ ti,wl1251-has-eeprom;
+ };
+};
reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1576073178146235@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hns@goldelico.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox