From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B3CC3F68F for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07525207FD for ; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 16:05:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1577635527; bh=c8lK0V0NAUR3ZEaZPwRSRBPbLA7CWXk49P6MudZEQWI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=a4W188TOudY90Ua//plA3n6DMpqZAJTIfjkLflJexsnr30hgNUS4oPmXZ4Xf4/ZS6 82jLuZIsjnJ2VWXU/1lx/voC2/mS47oPQ7IlvslcX271zZ8BRlVYqRkNfE9B8Uv2T0 MsusY3gkSTA8i2jO4Db0K5DNlBX5lS+ulGPGaWwk= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726597AbfL2QF0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:05:26 -0500 Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.20]:36859 "EHLO wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726455AbfL2QFZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:05:25 -0500 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC0E461; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:05:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:05:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=uwjXw6 fCDHO+eSTqIjET7w/MKCumUPSvMe5162jUkTE=; b=QzuyTZJUkmkVNWZRwMGNb5 Ey5qYbLTZMek9P/jix2QcvwGZaW7OWHf+wOHuyiWHZCaCmyKtwQoQTj4wzQnQxB0 EvGLNccWAK2ptZfBZppQ+Op1lnEH/7N9dqEtMyiXcP0fUSLFvpDNvgMneybzHUsV x2mHKhB7wvvLJGKrDwQ2b4ZfaIokC3prUuoPN0KmwEQgLQyb9dUWqR5Mc6lXGTsI 7Y2USH72QFbIGaqz5LgHK8lEwlKWHSCkkuZQFNniC+U8iX7fhVCGuKqIvejAQM97 C8JIGVAosFbDAphoWWsTYRLjbidiuDsOON/CxiFzTcsEKDY6IQ0PFBhkfR5DxYIA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdeffedgkeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvffhfffkgggtgfesthekredttd dtlfenucfhrhhomhepoehgrhgvghhkhheslhhinhhugihfohhunhgurghtihhonhdrohhr gheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghenucfkphepkeefrdekiedrkeelrd dutdejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomhen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D552F3060AC7; Sun, 29 Dec 2019 11:05:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Update the tuning failed messages to pr_debug" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree To: faiz_abbas@ti.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org Cc: From: Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2019 17:05:21 +0100 Message-ID: <1577635521151247@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 2c92dd20304f505b6ef43d206fff21bda8f1f0ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Faiz Abbas Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2019 17:13:26 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] mmc: sdhci: Update the tuning failed messages to pr_debug level Tuning support in DDR50 speed mode was added in SD Specifications Part1 Physical Layer Specification v3.01. Its not possible to distinguish between v3.00 and v3.01 from the SCR and that is why since commit 4324f6de6d2e ("mmc: core: enable CMD19 tuning for DDR50 mode") tuning failures are ignored in DDR50 speed mode. Cards compatible with v3.00 don't respond to CMD19 in DDR50 and this error gets printed during enumeration and also if retune is triggered at any time during operation. Update the printk level to pr_debug so that these errors don't lead to false error reports. Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191206114326.15856-1-faiz_abbas@ti.com Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c index 296d955ede59..42a9c8179da7 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @@ -2417,8 +2417,8 @@ static int __sdhci_execute_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 opcode) sdhci_send_tuning(host, opcode); if (!host->tuning_done) { - pr_info("%s: Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n", - mmc_hostname(host->mmc)); + pr_debug("%s: Tuning timeout, falling back to fixed sampling clock\n", + mmc_hostname(host->mmc)); sdhci_abort_tuning(host, opcode); return -ETIMEDOUT; }