FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree

[<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 43cc64e5221cc6741252b64bc4531dd1eefb733d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:43:00 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mmc: core: Respect MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY for
 erase/trim/discard

The busy timeout that is computed for each erase/trim/discard operation,
can become quite long and may thus exceed the host->max_busy_timeout. If
that becomes the case, mmc_do_erase() converts from using an R1B response
to an R1 response, as to prevent the host from doing HW busy detection.

However, it has turned out that some hosts requires an R1B response no
matter what, so let's respect that via checking MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY. Note
that, if the R1B gets enforced, the host becomes fully responsible of
managing the needed busy timeout, in one way or the other.

Suggested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
Tested-By: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
index aa54d359dab7..a971c4bcc442 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
@@ -1732,8 +1732,11 @@ static int mmc_do_erase(struct mmc_card *card, unsigned int from,
 	 * the erase operation does not exceed the max_busy_timeout, we should
 	 * use R1B response. Or we need to prevent the host from doing hw busy
 	 * detection, which is done by converting to a R1 response instead.
+	 * Note, some hosts requires R1B, which also means they are on their own
+	 * when it comes to deal with the busy timeout.
 	 */
-	if (card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
+	if (!(card->host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEED_RSP_BUSY) &&
+	    card->host->max_busy_timeout &&
 	    busy_timeout > card->host->max_busy_timeout) {
 		cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R1 | MMC_CMD_AC;
 	} else {