From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yarl-baudig@mailoo.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
Stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set" added to staging-linus
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1587384529145193@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set
to my staging git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
in the staging-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From e450e07c14abae563ad13b064cbce9fdccc6bc8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@mailoo.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 17:16:06 +0200
Subject: iio: st_sensors: rely on odr mask to know if odr can be set
Indeed, relying on addr being not 0 cannot work because some device have
their register to set odr at address 0. As a matter of fact, if the odr
can be set, then there is a mask.
Sensors with ODR register at address 0 are: lsm303dlh, lsm303dlhc, lsm303dlm
Fixes: 7d245172675a ("iio: common: st_sensors: check odr address value in st_sensors_set_odr()")
Signed-off-by: Lary Gibaud <yarl-baudig@mailoo.org>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
index 0e35ff06f9af..13bdfbbf5f71 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_core.c
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int st_sensors_set_odr(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, unsigned int odr)
struct st_sensor_odr_avl odr_out = {0, 0};
struct st_sensor_data *sdata = iio_priv(indio_dev);
- if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.addr)
+ if (!sdata->sensor_settings->odr.mask)
return 0;
err = st_sensors_match_odr(sdata->sensor_settings, odr, &odr_out);
--
2.26.1
reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1587384529145193@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yarl-baudig@mailoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).