stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn, dsterba@suse.com, tanxin.ctf@gmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 10:15:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <158858011184189@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From f6033c5e333238f299c3ae03fac8cc1365b23b77 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:54:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix block group leak when removing fails

btrfs_remove_block_group() invokes btrfs_lookup_block_group(), which
returns a local reference of the block group that contains the given
bytenr to "block_group" with increased refcount.

When btrfs_remove_block_group() returns, "block_group" becomes invalid,
so the refcount should be decreased to keep refcount balanced.

The reference counting issue happens in several exception handling paths
of btrfs_remove_block_group(). When those error scenarios occur such as
btrfs_alloc_path() returns NULL, the function forgets to decrease its
refcnt increased by btrfs_lookup_block_group() and will cause a refcnt
leak.

Fix this issue by jumping to "out_put_group" label and calling
btrfs_put_block_group() when those error scenarios occur.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Xiyu Yang <xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Xin Tan <tanxin.ctf@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index af9e9a008724..696f47103cfc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 	path = btrfs_alloc_path();
 	if (!path) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
+		goto out_put_group;
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -954,7 +954,7 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		ret = btrfs_orphan_add(trans, BTRFS_I(inode));
 		if (ret) {
 			btrfs_add_delayed_iput(inode);
-			goto out;
+			goto out_put_group;
 		}
 		clear_nlink(inode);
 		/* One for the block groups ref */
@@ -977,13 +977,13 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, tree_root, &key, path, -1, 1);
 	if (ret < 0)
-		goto out;
+		goto out_put_group;
 	if (ret > 0)
 		btrfs_release_path(path);
 	if (ret == 0) {
 		ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, tree_root, path);
 		if (ret)
-			goto out;
+			goto out_put_group;
 		btrfs_release_path(path);
 	}
 
@@ -1102,9 +1102,9 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 
 	ret = remove_block_group_free_space(trans, block_group);
 	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+		goto out_put_group;
 
-	btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
+	/* Once for the block groups rbtree */
 	btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
 
 	ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1);
@@ -1127,6 +1127,10 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		/* once for the tree */
 		free_extent_map(em);
 	}
+
+out_put_group:
+	/* Once for the lookup reference */
+	btrfs_put_block_group(block_group);
 out:
 	if (remove_rsv)
 		btrfs_delayed_refs_rsv_release(fs_info, 1);


                 reply	other threads:[~2020-05-04  8:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=158858011184189@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tanxin.ctf@gmail.com \
    --cc=xiyuyang19@fudan.edu.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).