From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB6AC433E0 for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4FC2075A for ; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:50:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1592848218; bh=wdHtUEicLGMqV1wIdyYcacU2IfGKgTEuR/H0a8+8p/I=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=CXouwPzgIkCuIE4GsAlfnI3nizerw4g3E+iOCNvsArokNKhtWH+LPUTe63THedxqg AQ4d+VdDlhvSMBvw6F0mHrdQXSPI0cqvCfWfYS1EVbeQnYvqrygwYZJOb00AI0ZI9D WZ3pD5SVJFyFRtvs6/DtKq3hudaKh41hZRiwXK+A= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730131AbgFVRuS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:18 -0400 Received: from wforward5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([64.147.123.35]:47145 "EHLO wforward5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729886AbgFVRuR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:17 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailforward.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AA11208; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=XnWgm2 JOIQMeS5EFJVwtjZj8aQXf4rxQBzJqI9Jo2R4=; b=kHUy3ajCCvQITg4lTb8usf bAA0AiZ8MlwYgY2rQWqUeDRKc6M5qpeIGhyrCtm7PKiQgXyZTup7JaLCvfxtXIOC KqbySS1uPxGvILpfVwNGRvGOxaNZeXeVC2mBXMzS79Uy6ggN3/tpLM3fF9Ti0ANY DV/9VdgiUi+j6Emdx7GobHfj+RIaDU1sTxRMpQnUNzqw1a9HBFqPoMWIS3OlcEKv rpJhHLKKxpnPQaS9dp3SBoyHYy7JfsL/YGU57uKMJswql54ugqQwp2cMoTJwtB5A c19vK+m0BBzERYgXw5jgp4xKjhOTiB5mC14izxft5BmYwb+k03UfB58lC1Foho1g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekvddguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvhfffkfggtgfgsehtkeertd dttdflnecuhfhrohhmpeeoghhrvghgkhhhsehlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdho rhhgqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeelleelvdegfeelledtteegudegfffghfduffduud ekgeefleegieegkeejhfelveenucffohhmrghinhepkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgnecukfhp peekfedrkeeirdekledruddtjeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmh epmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09DBF3280069; Mon, 22 Jun 2020 13:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ext4: fix partial cluster initialization when splitting" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree To: jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com, enwlinux@gmail.com, tytso@mit.edu Cc: From: Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 19:50:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1592848211169114@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From cfb3c85a600c6aa25a2581b3c1c4db3460f14e46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffle Xu Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:18:44 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix partial cluster initialization when splitting extent Fix the bug when calculating the physical block number of the first block in the split extent. This bug will cause xfstests shared/298 failure on ext4 with bigalloc enabled occasionally. Ext4 error messages indicate that previously freed blocks are being freed again, and the following fsck will fail due to the inconsistency of block bitmap and bg descriptor. The following is an example case: 1. First, Initialize a ext4 filesystem with cluster size '16K', block size '4K', in which case, one cluster contains four blocks. 2. Create one file (e.g., xxx.img) on this ext4 filesystem. Now the extent tree of this file is like: ... 36864:[0]4:220160 36868:[0]14332:145408 51200:[0]2:231424 ... 3. Then execute PUNCH_HOLE fallocate on this file. The hole range is like: .. ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49506 end 49506 depth 1 ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49544 end 49546 depth 1 ext4_ext_remove_space: dev 254,16 ino 12 since 49605 end 49607 depth 1 ... 4. Then the extent tree of this file after punching is like ... 49507:[0]37:158047 49547:[0]58:158087 ... 5. Detailed procedure of punching hole [49544, 49546] 5.1. The block address space: ``` lblk ~49505 49506 49507~49543 49544~49546 49547~ ---------+------+-------------+----------------+-------- extent | hole | extent | hole | extent ---------+------+-------------+----------------+-------- pblk ~158045 158046 158047~158083 158084~158086 158087~ ``` 5.2. The detailed layout of cluster 39521: ``` cluster 39521 <-------------------------------> hole extent <----------------------><-------- lblk 49544 49545 49546 49547 +-------+-------+-------+-------+ | | | | | +-------+-------+-------+-------+ pblk 158084 1580845 158086 158087 ``` 5.3. The ftrace output when punching hole [49544, 49546]: - ext4_ext_remove_space (start 49544, end 49546) - ext4_ext_rm_leaf (start 49544, end 49546, last_extent [49507(158047), 40], partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2]) - ext4_remove_blocks (extent [49507(158047), 40], from 49544 to 49546, partial [pclu 39522 lblk 0 state 2] - ext4_free_blocks: (block 158084 count 4) - ext4_mballoc_free (extent 1/6753/1) 5.4. Ext4 error message in dmesg: EXT4-fs error (device vdb): mb_free_blocks:1457: group 1, block 158084:freeing already freed block (bit 6753); block bitmap corrupt. EXT4-fs error (device vdb): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:747: group 1, block bitmap and bg descriptor inconsistent: 19550 vs 19551 free clusters In this case, the whole cluster 39521 is freed mistakenly when freeing pblock 158084~158086 (i.e., the first three blocks of this cluster), although pblock 158087 (the last remaining block of this cluster) has not been freed yet. The root cause of this isuue is that, the pclu of the partial cluster is calculated mistakenly in ext4_ext_remove_space(). The correct partial_cluster.pclu (i.e., the cluster number of the first block in the next extent, that is, lblock 49597 (pblock 158086)) should be 39521 rather than 39522. Fixes: f4226d9ea400 ("ext4: fix partial cluster initialization") Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu Reviewed-by: Eric Whitney Cc: stable@kernel.org # v3.19+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1590121124-37096-1-git-send-email-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 7d088ff1e902..221f240eae60 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -2844,7 +2844,7 @@ int ext4_ext_remove_space(struct inode *inode, ext4_lblk_t start, * in use to avoid freeing it when removing blocks. */ if (sbi->s_cluster_ratio > 1) { - pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ex) + end - ee_block + 2; + pblk = ext4_ext_pblock(ex) + end - ee_block + 1; partial.pclu = EXT4_B2C(sbi, pblk); partial.state = nofree; }