From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yu.c.chen@intel.com, Stable@vger.kernel.org,
aaron.f.brown@intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] e1000e: Do not wake up the system via WOL if device wakeup is" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:58:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <159291351071145@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 6bf6be1127f7e6d4bf39f84d56854e944d045d74 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 01:59:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Do not wake up the system via WOL if device wakeup is
disabled
Currently the system will be woken up via WOL(Wake On LAN) even if the
device wakeup ability has been disabled via sysfs:
cat /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.6/power/wakeup
disabled
The system should not be woken up if the user has explicitly
disabled the wake up ability for this device.
This patch clears the WOL ability of this network device if the
user has disabled the wake up ability in sysfs.
Fixes: bc7f75fa9788 ("[E1000E]: New pci-express e1000 driver")
Reported-by: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index a279f4fa9962..e2ad3f38c75c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -6611,11 +6611,17 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
struct e1000_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
- u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status;
- /* Runtime suspend should only enable wakeup for link changes */
- u32 wufc = runtime ? E1000_WUFC_LNKC : adapter->wol;
+ u32 ctrl, ctrl_ext, rctl, status, wufc;
int retval = 0;
+ /* Runtime suspend should only enable wakeup for link changes */
+ if (runtime)
+ wufc = E1000_WUFC_LNKC;
+ else if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev))
+ wufc = adapter->wol;
+ else
+ wufc = 0;
+
status = er32(STATUS);
if (status & E1000_STATUS_LU)
wufc &= ~E1000_WUFC_LNKC;
@@ -6672,7 +6678,7 @@ static int __e1000_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool runtime)
if (adapter->hw.phy.type == e1000_phy_igp_3) {
e1000e_igp3_phy_powerdown_workaround_ich8lan(&adapter->hw);
} else if (hw->mac.type >= e1000_pch_lpt) {
- if (!(wufc & (E1000_WUFC_EX | E1000_WUFC_MC | E1000_WUFC_BC)))
+ if (wufc && !(wufc & (E1000_WUFC_EX | E1000_WUFC_MC | E1000_WUFC_BC)))
/* ULP does not support wake from unicast, multicast
* or broadcast.
*/
reply other threads:[~2020-06-23 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=159291351071145@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=aaron.f.brown@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).