From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp, geert+renesas@glider.be,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, stable@kernel.org,
syzbot+805f5f6ae37411f15b64@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] driver core: Fix probe_count imbalance in really_probe()" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 12:38:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15976606839978@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From b292b50b0efcc7095d8bf15505fba6909bb35dce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 11:12:54 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] driver core: Fix probe_count imbalance in really_probe()
syzbot is reporting hung task in wait_for_device_probe() [1]. At least,
we always need to decrement probe_count if we incremented probe_count in
really_probe().
However, since I can't find "Resources present before probing" message in
the console log, both "this message simply flowed off" and "syzbot is not
hitting this path" will be possible. Therefore, while we are at it, let's
also prepare for concurrent wait_for_device_probe() calls by replacing
wake_up() with wake_up_all().
[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=25c833f1983c9c1d512f4ff860dd0d7f5a2e2c0f
Reported-by: syzbot <syzbot+805f5f6ae37411f15b64@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Fixes: 7c35e699c88bd607 ("driver core: Print device when resources present in really_probe()")
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200713021254.3444-1-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
index 2306b481109a..fce8e35b6367 100644
--- a/drivers/base/dd.c
+++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
@@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static void deferred_probe_timeout_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
list_for_each_entry_safe(private, p, &deferred_probe_pending_list, deferred_probe)
dev_info(private->device, "deferred probe pending\n");
- wake_up(&probe_timeout_waitqueue);
+ wake_up_all(&probe_timeout_waitqueue);
}
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(deferred_probe_timeout_work, deferred_probe_timeout_work_func);
@@ -498,7 +498,8 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
drv->bus->name, __func__, drv->name, dev_name(dev));
if (!list_empty(&dev->devres_head)) {
dev_crit(dev, "Resources present before probing\n");
- return -EBUSY;
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ goto done;
}
re_probe:
@@ -627,7 +628,7 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
ret = 0;
done:
atomic_dec(&probe_count);
- wake_up(&probe_waitqueue);
+ wake_up_all(&probe_waitqueue);
return ret;
}
reply other threads:[~2020-08-17 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15976606839978@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+805f5f6ae37411f15b64@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).