From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: haokexin@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Honor the tracing_cpumask" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 14:30:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1597840205103185@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 96b4833b6827a62c295b149213c68b559514c929 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:23:18 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/hwlat: Honor the tracing_cpumask
In calculation of the cpu mask for the hwlat kernel thread, the wrong
cpu mask is used instead of the tracing_cpumask, this causes the
tracing/tracing_cpumask useless for hwlat tracer. Fixes it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200730082318.42584-2-haokexin@gmail.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0330f7aa8ee6 ("tracing: Have hwlat trace migrate across tracing_cpumask CPUs")
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hao <haokexin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
index ddb528a6cd51..17873e5d0353 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ static bool disable_migrate;
static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
{
struct cpumask *current_mask = &save_cpumask;
+ struct trace_array *tr = hwlat_trace;
int next_cpu;
if (disable_migrate)
@@ -296,7 +297,7 @@ static void move_to_next_cpu(void)
goto disable;
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
next_cpu = cpumask_next(smp_processor_id(), current_mask);
put_online_cpus();
@@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ static int start_kthread(struct trace_array *tr)
/* Just pick the first CPU on first iteration */
get_online_cpus();
- cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tracing_buffer_mask);
+ cpumask_and(current_mask, cpu_online_mask, tr->tracing_cpumask);
put_online_cpus();
next_cpu = cpumask_first(current_mask);
reply other threads:[~2020-08-19 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1597840205103185@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=haokexin@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).