From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: lorenzo@kernel.org, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
Stable@vger.kernel.org, jic23@kernel.org,
linus.walleij@linaro.org
Subject: patch "iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in" added to staging-linus
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 08:17:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1610695026178132@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in
to my staging git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
in the staging-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 40c48fb79b9798954691f24b8ece1d3a7eb1b353 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 15:36:40 +0100
Subject: iio: common: st_sensors: fix possible infinite loop in
st_sensors_irq_thread
Return a boolean value in st_sensors_new_samples_available routine in
order to avoid an infinite loop in st_sensors_irq_thread if
stat_drdy.addr is not defined or stat_drdy read fails
Fixes: 90efe05562921 ("iio: st_sensors: harden interrupt handling")
Reported-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c9ec69ed349e7200c779fd7a5bf04c1aaa2817aa.1607438132.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Cc: <Stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---
.../common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c | 31 ++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
index 0507283bd4c1..2dbd2646e44e 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/st_sensors/st_sensors_trigger.c
@@ -23,35 +23,31 @@
* @sdata: Sensor data.
*
* returns:
- * 0 - no new samples available
- * 1 - new samples available
- * negative - error or unknown
+ * false - no new samples available or read error
+ * true - new samples available
*/
-static int st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
- struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
+static bool st_sensors_new_samples_available(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
+ struct st_sensor_data *sdata)
{
int ret, status;
/* How would I know if I can't check it? */
if (!sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr)
- return -EINVAL;
+ return true;
/* No scan mask, no interrupt */
if (!indio_dev->active_scan_mask)
- return 0;
+ return false;
ret = regmap_read(sdata->regmap,
sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr,
&status);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(sdata->dev, "error checking samples available\n");
- return ret;
+ return false;
}
- if (status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask)
- return 1;
-
- return 0;
+ return !!(status & sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.mask);
}
/**
@@ -180,9 +176,15 @@ int st_sensors_allocate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
/* Tell the interrupt handler that we're dealing with edges */
if (irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING ||
- irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING)
+ irq_trig == IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING) {
+ if (!sdata->sensor_settings->drdy_irq.stat_drdy.addr) {
+ dev_err(&indio_dev->dev,
+ "edge IRQ not supported w/o stat register.\n");
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto iio_trigger_free;
+ }
sdata->edge_irq = true;
- else
+ } else {
/*
* If we're not using edges (i.e. level interrupts) we
* just mask off the IRQ, handle one interrupt, then
@@ -190,6 +192,7 @@ int st_sensors_allocate_trigger(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
* interrupt handler top half again and start over.
*/
irq_trig |= IRQF_ONESHOT;
+ }
/*
* If the interrupt pin is Open Drain, by definition this
--
2.30.0
reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1610695026178132@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox