From: "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
To: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
bjorn.andersson@linaro.org
Cc: "Isaac J. Manjarres" <isaacm@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Fix mask extraction for bootloader programmed SMRs
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:52:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1611611545-19055-1-git-send-email-isaacm@codeaurora.org> (raw)
When extracting the mask for a SMR that was programmed by the
bootloader, the SMR's valid bit is also extracted and is treated
as part of the mask, which is not correct. Consider the scenario
where an SMMU master whose context is determined by a bootloader
programmed SMR is removed (omitting parts of device/driver core):
->iommu_release_device()
-> arm_smmu_release_device()
-> arm_smmu_master_free_smes()
-> arm_smmu_free_sme() /* Assume that the SME is now free */
-> arm_smmu_write_sme()
-> arm_smmu_write_smr() /* Construct SMR value using mask and SID */
Since the valid bit was considered as part of the mask, the SMR will
be programmed as valid.
Fix the SMR mask extraction step for bootloader programmed SMRs
by masking out the valid bit when we know that we're already
working with a valid SMR.
Fixes: 07a7f2caaa5a ("iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Read back stream mappings")
Signed-off-by: Isaac J. Manjarres <isaacm@codeaurora.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
index bcda170..abb1d2f 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static int qcom_smmu_cfg_probe(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
smr = arm_smmu_gr0_read(smmu, ARM_SMMU_GR0_SMR(i));
if (FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID, smr)) {
+ /* Ignore valid bit for SMR mask extraction. */
+ smr &= ~ARM_SMMU_SMR_VALID;
smmu->smrs[i].id = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_ID, smr);
smmu->smrs[i].mask = FIELD_GET(ARM_SMMU_SMR_MASK, smr);
smmu->smrs[i].valid = true;
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next reply other threads:[~2021-01-25 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-25 21:52 Isaac J. Manjarres [this message]
2021-01-26 10:34 ` [PATCH] iommu/arm-smmu-qcom: Fix mask extraction for bootloader programmed SMRs Robin Murphy
2021-01-26 22:35 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1611611545-19055-1-git-send-email-isaacm@codeaurora.org \
--to=isaacm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox