public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: hdegoede@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Stop reporting SW_DOCK events" failed to apply to 5.12-stable tree
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 10:51:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162080946671117@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 2728f39dfc720983e2b69f0f1f0c403aaa7c346f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 17:35:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Stop reporting SW_DOCK events

Stop reporting SW_DOCK events because this breaks suspend-on-lid-close.

SW_DOCK should only be reported for docking stations, but all the DSDTs in
my DSDT collection which use the intel-vbtn code, always seem to use this
for 2-in-1s / convertibles and set SW_DOCK=1 when in laptop-mode (in tandem
with setting SW_TABLET_MODE=0).

This causes userspace to think the laptop is docked to a port-replicator
and to disable suspend-on-lid-close, which is undesirable.

Map the dock events to KEY_IGNORE to avoid this broken SW_DOCK reporting.

Note this may theoretically cause us to stop reporting SW_DOCK on some
device where the 0xCA and 0xCB intel-vbtn events are actually used for
reporting docking to a classic docking-station / port-replicator but
I'm not aware of any such devices.

Also the most important thing is that we only report SW_DOCK when it
reliably reports being docked to a classic docking-station without any
false positives, which clearly is not the case here. If there is a
chance of reporting false positives then it is better to not report
SW_DOCK at all.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210321163513.72328-1-hdegoede@redhat.com

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
index 8a8017f9ca91..3fdf4cbec9ad 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel-vbtn.c
@@ -48,8 +48,16 @@ static const struct key_entry intel_vbtn_keymap[] = {
 };
 
 static const struct key_entry intel_vbtn_switchmap[] = {
-	{ KE_SW,     0xCA, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 1 } } },		/* Docked */
-	{ KE_SW,     0xCB, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 0 } } },		/* Undocked */
+	/*
+	 * SW_DOCK should only be reported for docking stations, but DSDTs using the
+	 * intel-vbtn code, always seem to use this for 2-in-1s / convertibles and set
+	 * SW_DOCK=1 when in laptop-mode (in tandem with setting SW_TABLET_MODE=0).
+	 * This causes userspace to think the laptop is docked to a port-replicator
+	 * and to disable suspend-on-lid-close, which is undesirable.
+	 * Map the dock events to KEY_IGNORE to avoid this broken SW_DOCK reporting.
+	 */
+	{ KE_IGNORE, 0xCA, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 1 } } },		/* Docked */
+	{ KE_IGNORE, 0xCB, { .sw = { SW_DOCK, 0 } } },		/* Undocked */
 	{ KE_SW,     0xCC, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 1 } } },	/* Tablet */
 	{ KE_SW,     0xCD, { .sw = { SW_TABLET_MODE, 0 } } },	/* Laptop */
 	{ KE_END }


             reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-12  8:51 gregkh [this message]
2021-05-12  9:43 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] platform/x86: intel-vbtn: Stop reporting SW_DOCK events" failed to apply to 5.12-stable tree Hans de Goede
2021-05-12  9:55   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162080946671117@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox