* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] SUNRPC in case of backlog, hand free slots directly to" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
@ 2021-05-30 13:58 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2021-05-30 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: neilb, trond.myklebust; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From e877a88d1f069edced4160792f42c2a8e2dba942 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 09:59:10 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] SUNRPC in case of backlog, hand free slots directly to
waiting task
If sunrpc.tcp_max_slot_table_entries is small and there are tasks
on the backlog queue, then when a request completes it is freed and the
first task on the queue is woken. The expectation is that it will wake
and claim that request. However if it was a sync task and the waiting
process was killed at just that moment, it will wake and NOT claim the
request.
As long as TASK_CONGESTED remains set, requests can only be claimed by
tasks woken from the backlog, and they are woken only as requests are
freed, so when a task doesn't claim a request, no other task can ever
get that request until TASK_CONGESTED is cleared. Each time this
happens the number of available requests is decreased by one.
With a sufficiently high workload and sufficiently low setting of
max_slot (16 in the case where this was seen), TASK_CONGESTED can remain
set for an extended period, and the above scenario (of a process being
killed just as its task was woken) can repeat until no requests can be
allocated. Then traffic stops.
This patch addresses the problem by introducing a positive handover of a
request from a completing task to a backlog task - the request is never
freed when there is a backlog.
When a task is woken it might not already have a request attached in
which case it is *not* freed (as with current code) but is initialised
(if needed) and used. If it isn't used it will eventually be freed by
rpc_exit_task(). xprt_release() is enhanced to be able to correctly
release an uninitialised request.
Fixes: ba60eb25ff6b ("SUNRPC: Fix a livelock problem in the xprt->backlog queue")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
index f555d335e910..42623d6b8f0e 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/clnt.c
@@ -1677,13 +1677,6 @@ call_reserveresult(struct rpc_task *task)
return;
}
- /*
- * Even though there was an error, we may have acquired
- * a request slot somehow. Make sure not to leak it.
- */
- if (task->tk_rqstp)
- xprt_release(task);
-
switch (status) {
case -ENOMEM:
rpc_delay(task, HZ >> 2);
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
index e5b5a960a69b..5b3981fd3783 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprt.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@
static void xprt_init(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct net *net);
static __be32 xprt_alloc_xid(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
static void xprt_destroy(struct rpc_xprt *xprt);
+static void xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task);
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(xprt_list_lock);
static LIST_HEAD(xprt_list);
@@ -1612,10 +1613,26 @@ static void xprt_add_backlog(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task)
rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->backlog, task, NULL);
}
-static void xprt_wake_up_backlog(struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
+static bool __xprt_set_rq(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
{
- if (rpc_wake_up_next(&xprt->backlog) == NULL)
+ struct rpc_rqst *req = data;
+
+ if (task->tk_rqstp == NULL) {
+ memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); /* mark unused */
+ task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
+ task->tk_rqstp = req;
+ return true;
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+static bool xprt_wake_up_backlog(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_rqst *req)
+{
+ if (rpc_wake_up_first(&xprt->backlog, __xprt_set_rq, req) == NULL) {
clear_bit(XPRT_CONGESTED, &xprt->state);
+ return false;
+ }
+ return true;
}
static bool xprt_throttle_congested(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_task *task)
@@ -1703,11 +1720,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xprt_alloc_slot);
void xprt_free_slot(struct rpc_xprt *xprt, struct rpc_rqst *req)
{
spin_lock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
- if (!xprt_dynamic_free_slot(xprt, req)) {
+ if (!xprt_wake_up_backlog(xprt, req) &&
+ !xprt_dynamic_free_slot(xprt, req)) {
memset(req, 0, sizeof(*req)); /* mark unused */
list_add(&req->rq_list, &xprt->free);
}
- xprt_wake_up_backlog(xprt);
spin_unlock(&xprt->reserve_lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xprt_free_slot);
@@ -1795,6 +1812,10 @@ xprt_request_init(struct rpc_task *task)
struct rpc_xprt *xprt = task->tk_xprt;
struct rpc_rqst *req = task->tk_rqstp;
+ if (req->rq_task)
+ /* Already initialized */
+ return;
+
req->rq_task = task;
req->rq_xprt = xprt;
req->rq_buffer = NULL;
@@ -1855,8 +1876,10 @@ void xprt_retry_reserve(struct rpc_task *task)
struct rpc_xprt *xprt = task->tk_xprt;
task->tk_status = 0;
- if (task->tk_rqstp != NULL)
+ if (task->tk_rqstp != NULL) {
+ xprt_request_init(task);
return;
+ }
task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
xprt_do_reserve(xprt, task);
@@ -1881,23 +1904,26 @@ void xprt_release(struct rpc_task *task)
}
xprt = req->rq_xprt;
- xprt_request_dequeue_xprt(task);
- spin_lock(&xprt->transport_lock);
- xprt->ops->release_xprt(xprt, task);
- if (xprt->ops->release_request)
- xprt->ops->release_request(task);
- xprt_schedule_autodisconnect(xprt);
- spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock);
- if (req->rq_buffer)
- xprt->ops->buf_free(task);
- xdr_free_bvec(&req->rq_rcv_buf);
- xdr_free_bvec(&req->rq_snd_buf);
- if (req->rq_cred != NULL)
- put_rpccred(req->rq_cred);
- task->tk_rqstp = NULL;
- if (req->rq_release_snd_buf)
- req->rq_release_snd_buf(req);
+ if (xprt) {
+ xprt_request_dequeue_xprt(task);
+ spin_lock(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ xprt->ops->release_xprt(xprt, task);
+ if (xprt->ops->release_request)
+ xprt->ops->release_request(task);
+ xprt_schedule_autodisconnect(xprt);
+ spin_unlock(&xprt->transport_lock);
+ if (req->rq_buffer)
+ xprt->ops->buf_free(task);
+ xdr_free_bvec(&req->rq_rcv_buf);
+ xdr_free_bvec(&req->rq_snd_buf);
+ if (req->rq_cred != NULL)
+ put_rpccred(req->rq_cred);
+ if (req->rq_release_snd_buf)
+ req->rq_release_snd_buf(req);
+ } else
+ xprt = task->tk_xprt;
+ task->tk_rqstp = NULL;
if (likely(!bc_prealloc(req)))
xprt->ops->free_slot(xprt, req);
else
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-05-30 13:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-30 13:58 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] SUNRPC in case of backlog, hand free slots directly to" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).