From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C04C49361 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344B561249 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:26:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230076AbhFQQ2J (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:28:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47714 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229741AbhFQQ2I (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jun 2021 12:28:08 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5D85610A5; Thu, 17 Jun 2021 16:26:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623947161; bh=1Bxl2Nw6AjWGY0KE7yYH/Q1fotKnwLUMuET1N6qT4s4=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:From; b=gzZORwnlDryklCgIQvD/7pYhv00dI2HXoI88rkHESx2d0avsBWBxRtDoB1/NydedP igP/wsCAylY/xBqScsmfTgh5sWXt0hA7cka4/e8rL8P7RyklFi6CTrVSbEBM7IOlTu kl71C4Xd9s5j+t1g+0ZI9yIzPkWbvBSwek+h2qEs= Subject: patch "iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth register values" added to staging-testing To: stephan@gerhold.net, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com, Stable@vger.kernel.org, linus.walleij@linaro.org, pmeerw@pmeerw.net From: Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2021 18:24:46 +0200 Message-ID: <16239470863797@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth register values to my staging git tree which can be found at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git in the staging-testing branch. The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree (usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.) The patch will be merged to the staging-next branch sometime soon, after it passes testing, and the merge window is open. If you have any questions about this process, please let me know. >From 8090d67421ddab0ae932abab5a60200598bf0bbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephan Gerhold Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 11:44:07 +0200 Subject: iio: accel: bma180: Fix BMA25x bandwidth register values MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit According to the BMA253 datasheet [1] and BMA250 datasheet [2] the bandwidth value for BMA25x should be set as 01xxx: "Settings 00xxx result in a bandwidth of 7.81 Hz; [...] It is recommended [...] to use the range from ´01000b´ to ´01111b´ only in order to be compatible with future products." However, at the moment the drivers sets bandwidth values from 0 to 6, which is not recommended and always results into 7.81 Hz bandwidth according to the datasheet. Fix this by introducing a bw_offset = 8 = 01000b for BMA25x, so the additional bit is always set for BMA25x. [1]: https://www.bosch-sensortec.com/media/boschsensortec/downloads/datasheets/bst-bma253-ds000.pdf [2]: https://datasheet.octopart.com/BMA250-Bosch-datasheet-15540103.pdf Cc: Peter Meerwald Fixes: 2017cff24cc0 ("iio:bma180: Add BMA250 chip support") Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210526094408.34298-2-stephan@gerhold.net Cc: Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron --- drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c index 4a07e60c0e21..e7c6b3096cb7 100644 --- a/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/bma180.c @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ struct bma180_part_info { u8 int_reset_reg, int_reset_mask; u8 sleep_reg, sleep_mask; - u8 bw_reg, bw_mask; + u8 bw_reg, bw_mask, bw_offset; u8 scale_reg, scale_mask; u8 power_reg, power_mask, lowpower_val; u8 int_enable_reg, int_enable_mask; @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ struct bma180_part_info { #define BMA250_RANGE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) /* Range of accel values */ #define BMA250_BW_MASK GENMASK(4, 0) /* Accel bandwidth */ +#define BMA250_BW_OFFSET 8 #define BMA250_SUSPEND_MASK BIT(7) /* chip will sleep */ #define BMA250_LOWPOWER_MASK BIT(6) #define BMA250_DATA_INTEN_MASK BIT(4) @@ -143,6 +144,7 @@ struct bma180_part_info { #define BMA254_RANGE_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) /* Range of accel values */ #define BMA254_BW_MASK GENMASK(4, 0) /* Accel bandwidth */ +#define BMA254_BW_OFFSET 8 #define BMA254_SUSPEND_MASK BIT(7) /* chip will sleep */ #define BMA254_LOWPOWER_MASK BIT(6) #define BMA254_DATA_INTEN_MASK BIT(4) @@ -287,7 +289,8 @@ static int bma180_set_bw(struct bma180_data *data, int val) for (i = 0; i < data->part_info->num_bw; ++i) { if (data->part_info->bw_table[i] == val) { ret = bma180_set_bits(data, data->part_info->bw_reg, - data->part_info->bw_mask, i); + data->part_info->bw_mask, + i + data->part_info->bw_offset); if (ret) { dev_err(&data->client->dev, "failed to set bandwidth\n"); @@ -880,6 +883,7 @@ static const struct bma180_part_info bma180_part_info[] = { .sleep_mask = BMA250_SUSPEND_MASK, .bw_reg = BMA250_BW_REG, .bw_mask = BMA250_BW_MASK, + .bw_offset = BMA250_BW_OFFSET, .scale_reg = BMA250_RANGE_REG, .scale_mask = BMA250_RANGE_MASK, .power_reg = BMA250_POWER_REG, @@ -909,6 +913,7 @@ static const struct bma180_part_info bma180_part_info[] = { .sleep_mask = BMA254_SUSPEND_MASK, .bw_reg = BMA254_BW_REG, .bw_mask = BMA254_BW_MASK, + .bw_offset = BMA254_BW_OFFSET, .scale_reg = BMA254_RANGE_REG, .scale_mask = BMA254_RANGE_MASK, .power_reg = BMA254_POWER_REG, -- 2.32.0