From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: bumyong.lee@samsung.com, chanho61.park@samsung.com,
dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com, hch@lst.de,
horia.geanta@nxp.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset" failed to apply to 5.12-stable tree
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 11:26:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16246131632380@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.12-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 5f89468e2f060031cd89fd4287298e0eaf246bf6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:10:04 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
in case of driver wants to sync part of ranges with offset,
swiotlb_tbl_sync_single() copies from orig_addr base to tlb_addr with
offset and ends up with data mismatch.
It was removed from
"swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single",
but said logic has to be added back in.
From Linus's email:
"That commit which the removed the offset calculation entirely, because the old
(unsigned long)tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)
was wrong, but instead of removing it, I think it should have just
fixed it to be
(tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
instead. That way the slot offset always matches the slot index calculation."
(Unfortunatly that broke NVMe).
The use-case that drivers are hitting is as follow:
1. Get dma_addr_t from dma_map_single()
dma_addr_t tlb_addr = dma_map_single(dev, vaddr, vsize, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
|<---------------vsize------------->|
+-----------------------------------+
| | original buffer
+-----------------------------------+
vaddr
swiotlb_align_offset
|<----->|<---------------vsize------------->|
+-------+-----------------------------------+
| | | swiotlb buffer
+-------+-----------------------------------+
tlb_addr
2. Do something
3. Sync dma_addr_t through dma_sync_single_for_device(..)
dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, tlb_addr + offset, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
Error case.
Copy data to original buffer but it is from base addr (instead of
base addr + offset) in original buffer:
swiotlb_align_offset
|<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
+-------+-----------------------------------+
| | |##########| | swiotlb buffer
+-------+-----------------------------------+
tlb_addr
|<- size ->|
+-----------------------------------+
|##########| | original buffer
+-----------------------------------+
vaddr
The fix is to copy the data to the original buffer and take into
account the offset, like so:
swiotlb_align_offset
|<----->|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
+-------+-----------------------------------+
| | |##########| | swiotlb buffer
+-------+-----------------------------------+
tlb_addr
|<- offset ->|<- size ->|
+-----------------------------------+
| |##########| | original buffer
+-----------------------------------+
vaddr
[One fix which was Linus's that made more sense to as it created a
symmetry would break NVMe. The reason for that is the:
unsigned int offset = (tlb_addr - mem->start) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
would come up with the proper offset, but it would lose the
alignment (which this patch contains).]
Fixes: 16fc3cef33a0 ("swiotlb: don't modify orig_addr in swiotlb_tbl_sync_single")
Signed-off-by: Bumyong Lee <bumyong.lee@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reported-by: Dominique MARTINET <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
Reported-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
Tested-by: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@nxp.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 8ca7d505d61c..e50df8d8f87e 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -334,6 +334,14 @@ void __init swiotlb_exit(void)
io_tlb_default_mem = NULL;
}
+/*
+ * Return the offset into a iotlb slot required to keep the device happy.
+ */
+static unsigned int swiotlb_align_offset(struct device *dev, u64 addr)
+{
+ return addr & dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
+}
+
/*
* Bounce: copy the swiotlb buffer from or back to the original dma location
*/
@@ -346,10 +354,17 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
size_t alloc_size = mem->slots[index].alloc_size;
unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(orig_addr);
unsigned char *vaddr = phys_to_virt(tlb_addr);
+ unsigned int tlb_offset;
if (orig_addr == INVALID_PHYS_ADDR)
return;
+ tlb_offset = (tlb_addr & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1)) -
+ swiotlb_align_offset(dev, orig_addr);
+
+ orig_addr += tlb_offset;
+ alloc_size -= tlb_offset;
+
if (size > alloc_size) {
dev_WARN_ONCE(dev, 1,
"Buffer overflow detected. Allocation size: %zu. Mapping size: %zu.\n",
@@ -390,14 +405,6 @@ static void swiotlb_bounce(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr, size_t size
#define slot_addr(start, idx) ((start) + ((idx) << IO_TLB_SHIFT))
-/*
- * Return the offset into a iotlb slot required to keep the device happy.
- */
-static unsigned int swiotlb_align_offset(struct device *dev, u64 addr)
-{
- return addr & dma_get_min_align_mask(dev) & (IO_TLB_SIZE - 1);
-}
-
/*
* Carefully handle integer overflow which can occur when boundary_mask == ~0UL.
*/
next reply other threads:[~2021-06-25 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-25 9:26 gregkh [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20210628065823epcas2p19305f8b888a7fc0e883ec51db61e3bae@epcas2p1.samsung.com>
2021-06-28 6:59 ` [PATCH] swiotlb: manipulate orig_addr when tlb_addr has offset Chanho Park
2021-06-28 9:05 ` Greg KH
2021-06-28 9:25 ` Chanho Park
2021-06-28 9:36 ` 'Greg KH'
2021-06-28 10:05 ` Chanho Park
2021-06-28 12:20 ` 'Greg KH'
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16246131632380@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bumyong.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=chanho61.park@samsung.com \
--cc=dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=horia.geanta@nxp.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).