From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: seanjc@google.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
thomas.lendacky@amd.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:53:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16285064275244@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 179c6c27bf487273652efc99acd3ba512a23c137 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:27:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix off-by-one indexing when nullifying last used
SEV VMCB
Use the raw ASID, not ASID-1, when nullifying the last used VMCB when
freeing an SEV ASID. The consumer, pre_sev_run(), indexes the array by
the raw ASID, thus KVM could get a false negative when checking for a
different VMCB if KVM manages to reallocate the same ASID+VMCB combo for
a new VM.
Note, this cannot cause a functional issue _in the current code_, as
pre_sev_run() also checks which pCPU last did VMRUN for the vCPU, and
last_vmentry_cpu is initialized to -1 during vCPU creation, i.e. is
guaranteed to mismatch on the first VMRUN. However, prior to commit
8a14fe4f0c54 ("kvm: x86: Move last_cpu into kvm_vcpu_arch as
last_vmentry_cpu"), SVM tracked pCPU on its own and zero-initialized the
last_cpu variable. Thus it's theoretically possible that older versions
of KVM could miss a TLB flush if the first VMRUN is on pCPU0 and the ASID
and VMCB exactly match those of a prior VM.
Fixes: 70cd94e60c73 ("KVM: SVM: VMRUN should use associated ASID when SEV is enabled")
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
index 6710d9ee2e4b..4d0aba185412 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static void sev_asid_free(struct kvm_sev_info *sev)
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
sd = per_cpu(svm_data, cpu);
- sd->sev_vmcbs[pos] = NULL;
+ sd->sev_vmcbs[sev->asid] = NULL;
}
mutex_unlock(&sev_bitmap_lock);
reply other threads:[~2021-08-09 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16285064275244@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox