From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
gurucharanx.g@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ice: safer stats processing" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 15:33:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1639319603230199@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 1a0f25a52e08b1f67510cabbb44888d2b3c46359 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 17:06:02 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ice: safer stats processing
The driver was zeroing live stats that could be fetched by
ndo_get_stats64 at any time. This could result in inconsistent
statistics, and the telltale sign was when reading stats frequently from
/proc/net/dev, the stats would go backwards.
Fix by collecting stats into a local, and delaying when we write to the
structure so it's not incremental.
Fixes: fcea6f3da546 ("ice: Add stats and ethtool support")
Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
index c6d6ce52e2ca..73c61cdb036f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
@@ -5930,14 +5930,15 @@ ice_fetch_u64_stats_per_ring(struct u64_stats_sync *syncp, struct ice_q_stats st
/**
* ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats - Update VSI Tx ring stats counters
* @vsi: the VSI to be updated
+ * @vsi_stats: the stats struct to be updated
* @rings: rings to work on
* @count: number of rings
*/
static void
-ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring **rings,
- u16 count)
+ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi,
+ struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vsi_stats,
+ struct ice_tx_ring **rings, u16 count)
{
- struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vsi_stats = &vsi->net_stats;
u16 i;
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
@@ -5961,15 +5962,13 @@ ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi, struct ice_tx_ring **rings,
*/
static void ice_update_vsi_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
{
- struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vsi_stats = &vsi->net_stats;
+ struct rtnl_link_stats64 *vsi_stats;
u64 pkts, bytes;
int i;
- /* reset netdev stats */
- vsi_stats->tx_packets = 0;
- vsi_stats->tx_bytes = 0;
- vsi_stats->rx_packets = 0;
- vsi_stats->rx_bytes = 0;
+ vsi_stats = kzalloc(sizeof(*vsi_stats), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ if (!vsi_stats)
+ return;
/* reset non-netdev (extended) stats */
vsi->tx_restart = 0;
@@ -5981,7 +5980,8 @@ static void ice_update_vsi_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
rcu_read_lock();
/* update Tx rings counters */
- ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(vsi, vsi->tx_rings, vsi->num_txq);
+ ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(vsi, vsi_stats, vsi->tx_rings,
+ vsi->num_txq);
/* update Rx rings counters */
ice_for_each_rxq(vsi, i) {
@@ -5996,10 +5996,17 @@ static void ice_update_vsi_ring_stats(struct ice_vsi *vsi)
/* update XDP Tx rings counters */
if (ice_is_xdp_ena_vsi(vsi))
- ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(vsi, vsi->xdp_rings,
+ ice_update_vsi_tx_ring_stats(vsi, vsi_stats, vsi->xdp_rings,
vsi->num_xdp_txq);
rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ vsi->net_stats.tx_packets = vsi_stats->tx_packets;
+ vsi->net_stats.tx_bytes = vsi_stats->tx_bytes;
+ vsi->net_stats.rx_packets = vsi_stats->rx_packets;
+ vsi->net_stats.rx_bytes = vsi_stats->rx_bytes;
+
+ kfree(vsi_stats);
}
/**
reply other threads:[~2021-12-12 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1639319603230199@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=gurucharanx.g@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox