* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
@ 2022-01-23 15:47 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-01-23 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: hdegoede, andy.shevchenko, kitakar, lee.jones; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 5b78223f55a0f516a1639dbe11cd4324d4aaee20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 18:48:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check
to differentiate variants
The Intel Crystal Cove PMIC has 2 different variants, one for use with
Bay Trail (BYT) SoCs and one for use with Cherry Trail (CHT) SoCs.
So far we have been using an ACPI _HRV check to differentiate between
the 2, but at least on the Microsoft Surface 3, which is a CHT device,
the wrong _HRV value is reported by ACPI.
So instead switch to a CPU-ID check which prevents us from relying on
the possibly wrong ACPI _HRV value.
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206174806.197772-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
index ddd64f9e3341..47cb7f00dfcf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_core.c
@@ -14,15 +14,12 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mfd/core.h>
#include <linux/mfd/intel_soc_pmic.h>
+#include <linux/platform_data/x86/soc.h>
#include <linux/pwm.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include "intel_soc_pmic_core.h"
-/* Crystal Cove PMIC shares same ACPI ID between different platforms */
-#define BYT_CRC_HRV 2
-#define CHT_CRC_HRV 3
-
/* PWM consumed by the Intel GFX */
static struct pwm_lookup crc_pwm_lookup[] = {
PWM_LOOKUP("crystal_cove_pwm", 0, "0000:00:02.0", "pwm_pmic_backlight", 0, PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL),
@@ -34,31 +31,12 @@ static int intel_soc_pmic_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
struct device *dev = &i2c->dev;
struct intel_soc_pmic_config *config;
struct intel_soc_pmic *pmic;
- unsigned long long hrv;
- acpi_status status;
int ret;
- /*
- * There are 2 different Crystal Cove PMICs a Bay Trail and Cherry
- * Trail version, use _HRV to differentiate between the 2.
- */
- status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), "_HRV", NULL, &hrv);
- if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
- return -ENODEV;
- }
-
- switch (hrv) {
- case BYT_CRC_HRV:
+ if (soc_intel_is_byt())
config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_byt_crc;
- break;
- case CHT_CRC_HRV:
+ else
config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_cht_crc;
- break;
- default:
- dev_warn(dev, "Unknown hardware rev %llu, assuming BYT\n", hrv);
- config = &intel_soc_pmic_config_byt_crc;
- }
pmic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pmic)
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-01-23 15:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-23 15:47 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mfd: intel_soc_pmic: Use CPU-id check instead of _HRV check" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).