From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chengzhihao1@huawei.com, richard@nod.at
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ubifs: Fix deadlock in concurrent rename whiteout and inode" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2022 13:37:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16489858345152@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From afd427048047e8efdedab30e8888044e2be5aa9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2021 11:22:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ubifs: Fix deadlock in concurrent rename whiteout and inode
writeback
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Following hung tasks:
[ 77.028764] task:kworker/u8:4 state:D stack: 0 pid: 132
[ 77.028820] Call Trace:
[ 77.029027] schedule+0x8c/0x1b0
[ 77.029067] mutex_lock+0x50/0x60
[ 77.029074] ubifs_write_inode+0x68/0x1f0 [ubifs]
[ 77.029117] __writeback_single_inode+0x43c/0x570
[ 77.029128] writeback_sb_inodes+0x259/0x740
[ 77.029148] wb_writeback+0x107/0x4d0
[ 77.029163] wb_workfn+0x162/0x7b0
[ 92.390442] task:aa state:D stack: 0 pid: 1506
[ 92.390448] Call Trace:
[ 92.390458] schedule+0x8c/0x1b0
[ 92.390461] wb_wait_for_completion+0x82/0xd0
[ 92.390469] __writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0xb2/0x110
[ 92.390472] writeback_inodes_sb_nr+0x14/0x20
[ 92.390476] ubifs_budget_space+0x705/0xdd0 [ubifs]
[ 92.390503] do_rename.cold+0x7f/0x187 [ubifs]
[ 92.390549] ubifs_rename+0x8b/0x180 [ubifs]
[ 92.390571] vfs_rename+0xdb2/0x1170
[ 92.390580] do_renameat2+0x554/0x770
, are caused by concurrent rename whiteout and inode writeback processes:
rename_whiteout(Thread 1) wb_workfn(Thread2)
ubifs_rename
do_rename
lock_4_inodes (Hold ui_mutex)
ubifs_budget_space
make_free_space
shrink_liability
__writeback_inodes_sb_nr
bdi_split_work_to_wbs (Queue new wb work)
wb_do_writeback(wb work)
__writeback_single_inode
ubifs_write_inode
LOCK(ui_mutex)
↑
wb_wait_for_completion (Wait wb work) <-- deadlock!
Reproducer (Detail program in [Link]):
1. SYS_renameat2("/mp/dir/file", "/mp/dir/whiteout", RENAME_WHITEOUT)
2. Consume out of space before kernel(mdelay) doing budget for whiteout
Fix it by doing whiteout space budget before locking ubifs inodes.
BTW, it also fixes wrong goto tag 'out_release' in whiteout budget
error handling path(It should at least recover dir i_size and unlock
4 ubifs inodes).
Fixes: 9e0a1fff8db56ea ("ubifs: Implement RENAME_WHITEOUT")
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214733
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index d3ed93d94930..f4783e1ae775 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -1324,6 +1324,7 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
if (flags & RENAME_WHITEOUT) {
union ubifs_dev_desc *dev = NULL;
+ struct ubifs_budget_req wht_req;
dev = kmalloc(sizeof(union ubifs_dev_desc), GFP_NOFS);
if (!dev) {
@@ -1345,6 +1346,20 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
whiteout_ui->data = dev;
whiteout_ui->data_len = ubifs_encode_dev(dev, MKDEV(0, 0));
ubifs_assert(c, !whiteout_ui->dirty);
+
+ memset(&wht_req, 0, sizeof(struct ubifs_budget_req));
+ wht_req.dirtied_ino = 1;
+ wht_req.dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(whiteout_ui->data_len, 8);
+ /*
+ * To avoid deadlock between space budget (holds ui_mutex and
+ * waits wb work) and writeback work(waits ui_mutex), do space
+ * budget before ubifs inodes locked.
+ */
+ err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &wht_req);
+ if (err) {
+ iput(whiteout);
+ goto out_release;
+ }
}
lock_4_inodes(old_dir, new_dir, new_inode, whiteout);
@@ -1419,16 +1434,6 @@ static int do_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
}
if (whiteout) {
- struct ubifs_budget_req wht_req = { .dirtied_ino = 1,
- .dirtied_ino_d = \
- ALIGN(ubifs_inode(whiteout)->data_len, 8) };
-
- err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &wht_req);
- if (err) {
- iput(whiteout);
- goto out_release;
- }
-
inc_nlink(whiteout);
mark_inode_dirty(whiteout);
reply other threads:[~2022-04-03 11:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16489858345152@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).