* FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/sparsemem: fix 'mem_section' will never be NULL gcc 12" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
@ 2022-04-11 15:34 gregkh
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2022-04-11 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: longman, akpm, aquini, jforbes, kirill.shutemov, mingo, torvalds; +Cc: stable
The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a431dbbc540532b7465eae4fc8b56a85a9fc7d17 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 13:09:01 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] mm/sparsemem: fix 'mem_section' will never be NULL gcc 12
warning
The gcc 12 compiler reports a "'mem_section' will never be NULL" warning
on the following code:
static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
if (!mem_section)
return NULL;
#endif
if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
return NULL;
:
It happens with CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME off. The mem_section definition
is
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
extern struct mem_section **mem_section;
#else
extern struct mem_section mem_section[NR_SECTION_ROOTS][SECTIONS_PER_ROOT];
#endif
In the !CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME case, mem_section is a static
2-dimensional array and so the check "!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)]"
doesn't make sense.
Fix this warning by moving the "!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)]"
check up inside the CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME block and adding an
explicit NR_SECTION_ROOTS check to make sure that there is no
out-of-bound array access.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220331180246.2746210-1-longman@redhat.com
Fixes: 3e347261a80b ("sparsemem extreme implementation")
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Justin Forbes <jforbes@redhat.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
index 962b14d403e8..46ffab808f03 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
@@ -1397,13 +1397,16 @@ static inline unsigned long *section_to_usemap(struct mem_section *ms)
static inline struct mem_section *__nr_to_section(unsigned long nr)
{
+ unsigned long root = SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr);
+
+ if (unlikely(root >= NR_SECTION_ROOTS))
+ return NULL;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_EXTREME
- if (!mem_section)
+ if (!mem_section || !mem_section[root])
return NULL;
#endif
- if (!mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)])
- return NULL;
- return &mem_section[SECTION_NR_TO_ROOT(nr)][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
+ return &mem_section[root][nr & SECTION_ROOT_MASK];
}
extern size_t mem_section_usage_size(void);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-04-11 15:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-11 15:34 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/sparsemem: fix 'mem_section' will never be NULL gcc 12" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree gregkh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).