stable.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: daniel.starke@siemens.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tty: n_gsm: fix decoupled mux resource" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 01:11:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16515331037241@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 1ec92e9742774bf42614fceea3bf6b50c9409225 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 02:42:08 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: fix decoupled mux resource

The active mux instances are managed in the gsm_mux array and via mux_get()
and mux_put() functions separately. This gives a very loose coupling
between the actual instance and the gsm_mux array which manages it. It also
results in unnecessary lockings which makes it prone to failures. And it
creates a race condition if more than the maximum number of mux instances
are requested while the user changes the parameters of an active instance.
The user may loose ownership of the current mux instance in this case.
Fix this by moving the gsm_mux array handling to the mux allocation and
deallocation functions.

Fixes: e1eaea46bb40 ("tty: n_gsm line discipline")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220414094225.4527-3-daniel.starke@siemens.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index daaffcfadaae..f546dfe03d29 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -2136,18 +2136,6 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm, bool disc)
 	/* Finish outstanding timers, making sure they are done */
 	del_timer_sync(&gsm->t2_timer);
 
-	spin_lock(&gsm_mux_lock);
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MUX; i++) {
-		if (gsm_mux[i] == gsm) {
-			gsm_mux[i] = NULL;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
-	/* open failed before registering => nothing to do */
-	if (i == MAX_MUX)
-		return;
-
 	/* Free up any link layer users */
 	for (i = 0; i < NUM_DLCI; i++)
 		if (gsm->dlci[i])
@@ -2171,7 +2159,6 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm, bool disc)
 static int gsm_activate_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 {
 	struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
-	int i = 0;
 
 	timer_setup(&gsm->t2_timer, gsm_control_retransmit, 0);
 	init_waitqueue_head(&gsm->event);
@@ -2183,18 +2170,6 @@ static int gsm_activate_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 	else
 		gsm->receive = gsm1_receive;
 
-	spin_lock(&gsm_mux_lock);
-	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MUX; i++) {
-		if (gsm_mux[i] == NULL) {
-			gsm->num = i;
-			gsm_mux[i] = gsm;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
-	if (i == MAX_MUX)
-		return -EBUSY;
-
 	dlci = gsm_dlci_alloc(gsm, 0);
 	if (dlci == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -2210,6 +2185,15 @@ static int gsm_activate_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
  */
 static void gsm_free_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 {
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MUX; i++) {
+		if (gsm == gsm_mux[i]) {
+			gsm_mux[i] = NULL;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_destroy(&gsm->mutex);
 	kfree(gsm->txframe);
 	kfree(gsm->buf);
 	kfree(gsm);
@@ -2229,12 +2213,20 @@ static void gsm_free_muxr(struct kref *ref)
 
 static inline void mux_get(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm_mux_lock, flags);
 	kref_get(&gsm->ref);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm_mux_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static inline void mux_put(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 {
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&gsm_mux_lock, flags);
 	kref_put(&gsm->ref, gsm_free_muxr);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gsm_mux_lock, flags);
 }
 
 static inline unsigned int mux_num_to_base(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
@@ -2255,6 +2247,7 @@ static inline unsigned int mux_line_to_num(unsigned int line)
 
 static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
 {
+	int i;
 	struct gsm_mux *gsm = kzalloc(sizeof(struct gsm_mux), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (gsm == NULL)
 		return NULL;
@@ -2284,6 +2277,26 @@ static struct gsm_mux *gsm_alloc_mux(void)
 	gsm->mtu = 64;
 	gsm->dead = true;	/* Avoid early tty opens */
 
+	/* Store the instance to the mux array or abort if no space is
+	 * available.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&gsm_mux_lock);
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_MUX; i++) {
+		if (!gsm_mux[i]) {
+			gsm_mux[i] = gsm;
+			gsm->num = i;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
+	if (i == MAX_MUX) {
+		mutex_destroy(&gsm->mutex);
+		kfree(gsm->txframe);
+		kfree(gsm->buf);
+		kfree(gsm);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
 	return gsm;
 }
 


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-05-02 23:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16515331037241@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=daniel.starke@siemens.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).