From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: kuba@kernel.org, ppenkov@aviatrix.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: tun: stop NAPI when detaching queues" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2022 13:35:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <165693454242194@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From a8fc8cb5692aebb9c6f7afd4265366d25dcd1d01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 21:21:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] net: tun: stop NAPI when detaching queues
While looking at a syzbot report I noticed the NAPI only gets
disabled before it's deleted. I think that user can detach
the queue before destroying the device and the NAPI will never
be stopped.
Fixes: 943170998b20 ("tun: enable NAPI for TUN/TAP driver")
Acked-by: Petar Penkov <ppenkov@aviatrix.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220623042105.2274812-1-kuba@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 7fd0288c3789..e2eb35887394 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -273,6 +273,12 @@ static void tun_napi_init(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
}
}
+static void tun_napi_enable(struct tun_file *tfile)
+{
+ if (tfile->napi_enabled)
+ napi_enable(&tfile->napi);
+}
+
static void tun_napi_disable(struct tun_file *tfile)
{
if (tfile->napi_enabled)
@@ -653,8 +659,10 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
if (clean) {
RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
sock_put(&tfile->sk);
- } else
+ } else {
tun_disable_queue(tun, tfile);
+ tun_napi_disable(tfile);
+ }
synchronize_net();
tun_flow_delete_by_queue(tun, tun->numqueues + 1);
@@ -808,6 +816,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file,
if (tfile->detached) {
tun_enable_queue(tfile);
+ tun_napi_enable(tfile);
} else {
sock_hold(&tfile->sk);
tun_napi_init(tun, tfile, napi, napi_frags);
next reply other threads:[~2022-07-04 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-04 11:35 gregkh [this message]
2022-07-04 11:52 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net: tun: stop NAPI when detaching queues" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=165693454242194@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ppenkov@aviatrix.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox