public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: seanjc@google.com, ercli@ucdavis.edu, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Inject #UD if VMXON is attempted with incompatible" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 16:28:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166031448894245@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From c7d855c2aff2d511fd60ee2e356134c4fb394799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 21:35:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: nVMX: Inject #UD if VMXON is attempted with incompatible
 CR0/CR4

Inject a #UD if L1 attempts VMXON with a CR0 or CR4 that is disallowed
per the associated nested VMX MSRs' fixed0/1 settings.  KVM cannot rely
on hardware to perform the checks, even for the few checks that have
higher priority than VM-Exit, as (a) KVM may have forced CR0/CR4 bits in
hardware while running the guest, (b) there may incompatible CR0/CR4 bits
that have lower priority than VM-Exit, e.g. CR0.NE, and (c) userspace may
have further restricted the allowed CR0/CR4 values by manipulating the
guest's nested VMX MSRs.

Note, despite a very strong desire to throw shade at Jim, commit
70f3aac964ae ("kvm: nVMX: Remove superfluous VMX instruction fault checks")
is not to blame for the buggy behavior (though the comment...).  That
commit only removed the CR0.PE, EFLAGS.VM, and COMPATIBILITY mode checks
(though it did erroneously drop the CPL check, but that has already been
remedied).  KVM may force CR0.PE=1, but will do so only when also
forcing EFLAGS.VM=1 to emulate Real Mode, i.e. hardware will still #UD.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216033
Fixes: ec378aeef9df ("KVM: nVMX: Implement VMXON and VMXOFF")
Reported-by: Eric Li <ercli@ucdavis.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220607213604.3346000-4-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index bfa366938c49..9c3350545b09 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -4952,20 +4952,25 @@ static int handle_vmon(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		| FEAT_CTL_VMX_ENABLED_OUTSIDE_SMX;
 
 	/*
-	 * The Intel VMX Instruction Reference lists a bunch of bits that are
-	 * prerequisite to running VMXON, most notably cr4.VMXE must be set to
-	 * 1 (see vmx_is_valid_cr4() for when we allow the guest to set this).
-	 * Otherwise, we should fail with #UD.  But most faulting conditions
-	 * have already been checked by hardware, prior to the VM-exit for
-	 * VMXON.  We do test guest cr4.VMXE because processor CR4 always has
-	 * that bit set to 1 in non-root mode.
+	 * Note, KVM cannot rely on hardware to perform the CR0/CR4 #UD checks
+	 * that have higher priority than VM-Exit (see Intel SDM's pseudocode
+	 * for VMXON), as KVM must load valid CR0/CR4 values into hardware while
+	 * running the guest, i.e. KVM needs to check the _guest_ values.
+	 *
+	 * Rely on hardware for the other two pre-VM-Exit checks, !VM86 and
+	 * !COMPATIBILITY modes.  KVM may run the guest in VM86 to emulate Real
+	 * Mode, but KVM will never take the guest out of those modes.
 	 */
-	if (!kvm_read_cr4_bits(vcpu, X86_CR4_VMXE)) {
+	if (!nested_host_cr0_valid(vcpu, kvm_read_cr0(vcpu)) ||
+	    !nested_host_cr4_valid(vcpu, kvm_read_cr4(vcpu))) {
 		kvm_queue_exception(vcpu, UD_VECTOR);
 		return 1;
 	}
 
-	/* CPL=0 must be checked manually. */
+	/*
+	 * CPL=0 and all other checks that are lower priority than VM-Exit must
+	 * be checked manually.
+	 */
 	if (vmx_get_cpl(vcpu)) {
 		kvm_inject_gp(vcpu, 0);
 		return 1;


                 reply	other threads:[~2022-08-12 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=166031448894245@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=ercli@ucdavis.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox