public inbox for stable@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com, asmadeus@codewreck.org,
	linux_oss@crudebyte.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:49:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1660564171201106@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From aa7aeee169480e98cf41d83c01290a37e569be6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2022 09:14:02 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation

Ensure that the fid's iounit field is set to zero when a new fid is
created. Certain 9P operations, such as OPEN and CREATE, allow the
server to reply with an iounit size which the client code assigns to the
p9_fid struct shortly after the fid is created by p9_fid_create(). On
the other hand, an XATTRWALK operation doesn't allow for the server to
specify an iounit value. The iounit field of the newly allocated p9_fid
struct remained uninitialized in that case. Depending on allocation
patterns, the iounit value could have been something reasonable that was
carried over from previously freed fids or, in the worst case, could
have been arbitrary values from non-fid related usages of the memory
location.

The bug was detected in the Windows Subsystem for Linux 2 (WSL2) kernel
after the uninitialized iounit field resulted in the typical sequence of
two getxattr(2) syscalls, one to get the size of an xattr and another
after allocating a sufficiently sized buffer to fit the xattr value, to
hit an unexpected ERANGE error in the second call to getxattr(2). An
uninitialized iounit field would sometimes force rsize to be smaller
than the xattr value size in p9_client_read_once() and the 9P server in
WSL refused to chunk up the READ on the attr_fid and, instead, returned
ERANGE to the client. The virtfs server in QEMU seems happy to chunk up
the READ and this problem goes undetected there.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220710141402.803295-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com
Fixes: ebf46264a004 ("fs/9p: Add support user. xattr")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@crudebyte.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>

diff --git a/net/9p/client.c b/net/9p/client.c
index 89c5aeb00076..3c145a64dc2b 100644
--- a/net/9p/client.c
+++ b/net/9p/client.c
@@ -887,16 +887,13 @@ static struct p9_fid *p9_fid_create(struct p9_client *clnt)
 	struct p9_fid *fid;
 
 	p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_FID, "clnt %p\n", clnt);
-	fid = kmalloc(sizeof(*fid), GFP_KERNEL);
+	fid = kzalloc(sizeof(*fid), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!fid)
 		return NULL;
 
-	memset(&fid->qid, 0, sizeof(fid->qid));
 	fid->mode = -1;
 	fid->uid = current_fsuid();
 	fid->clnt = clnt;
-	fid->rdir = NULL;
-	fid->fid = 0;
 	refcount_set(&fid->count, 1);
 
 	idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);


             reply	other threads:[~2022-08-15 11:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15 11:49 gregkh [this message]
2022-08-15 12:51 ` FAILED: patch "[PATCH] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree asmadeus
2022-08-15 16:55   ` Tyler Hicks
2022-08-16  1:49 ` [PATCH 5.10 5.4 4.19] net/9p: Initialize the iounit field during fid creation Tyler Hicks
2022-08-19 11:04   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1660564171201106@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=asmadeus@codewreck.org \
    --cc=linux_oss@crudebyte.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox