From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571A5C28D13 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233695AbiHVIvi (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:51:38 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33296 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232555AbiHVIvh (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2022 04:51:37 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1043C65D8 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 01:51:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02AEB80EDC for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11122C433C1; Mon, 22 Aug 2022 08:51:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1661158294; bh=pxZg4Nl6ZfF58xFd+ed1fkhlJleyFFUwfUBa5XXRyMA=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:From; b=V3cEF+FoghK/XgEJAQJZCHIKm4SDpeUu7PKzDzQ/gif+7fOGyJRKpOH/x5RYuKf9I BdEFfO8EXu7xFpS7J8pkiDMZsk01fmpTvNE0MVXM/SROZ8KRaxX2o2VYFbnHFsOsWf hnXm2w5SZu1GZw2Fcz88uVU3kHV++pC15Mx7mMvU= Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vxlan: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree To: matthias.may@westermo.com, gnault@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org Cc: From: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 10:51:26 +0200 Message-ID: <1661158286146235@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From e488d4f5d6e4cd1e728ba4ddbdcd7ef5f4d13a21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias May Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:19:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] vxlan: do not use RT_TOS for IPv6 flowlabel According to Guillaume Nault RT_TOS should never be used for IPv6. Quote: RT_TOS() is an old macro used to interprete IPv4 TOS as described in the obsolete RFC 1349. It's conceptually wrong to use it even in IPv4 code, although, given the current state of the code, most of the existing calls have no consequence. But using RT_TOS() in IPv6 code is always a bug: IPv6 never had a "TOS" field to be interpreted the RFC 1349 way. There's no historical compatibility to worry about. Fixes: 1400615d64cf ("vxlan: allow setting ipv6 traffic class") Acked-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Matthias May Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c index 90811ab851fd..c3285242f74f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c @@ -2321,7 +2321,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *vxlan6_get_route(struct vxlan_dev *vxlan, fl6.flowi6_oif = oif; fl6.daddr = *daddr; fl6.saddr = *saddr; - fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(tos), label); + fl6.flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(tos, label); fl6.flowi6_mark = skb->mark; fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_UDP; fl6.fl6_dport = dport;