From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: ivecera@redhat.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
konrad0.jankowski@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] iavf: Fix deadlock in initialization" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 12:15:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1661163325187157@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From cbe9e51126305832cf407ee6bb556ce831488ffe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2022 19:58:45 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] iavf: Fix deadlock in initialization
Fix deadlock that occurs when iavf interface is a part of failover
configuration.
1. Mutex crit_lock is taken at the beginning of iavf_watchdog_task()
2. Function iavf_init_config_adapter() is called when adapter
state is __IAVF_INIT_CONFIG_ADAPTER
3. iavf_init_config_adapter() calls register_netdevice() that emits
NETDEV_REGISTER event
4. Notifier function failover_event() then calls
net_failover_slave_register() that calls dev_open()
5. dev_open() calls iavf_open() that tries to take crit_lock in
end-less loop
Stack trace:
...
[ 790.251876] usleep_range_state+0x5b/0x80
[ 790.252547] iavf_open+0x37/0x1d0 [iavf]
[ 790.253139] __dev_open+0xcd/0x160
[ 790.253699] dev_open+0x47/0x90
[ 790.254323] net_failover_slave_register+0x122/0x220 [net_failover]
[ 790.255213] failover_slave_register.part.7+0xd2/0x180 [failover]
[ 790.256050] failover_event+0x122/0x1ab [failover]
[ 790.256821] notifier_call_chain+0x47/0x70
[ 790.257510] register_netdevice+0x20f/0x550
[ 790.258263] iavf_watchdog_task+0x7c8/0xea0 [iavf]
[ 790.259009] process_one_work+0x1a7/0x360
[ 790.259705] worker_thread+0x30/0x390
To fix the situation we should check the current adapter state after
first unsuccessful mutex_trylock() and return with -EBUSY if it is
__IAVF_INIT_CONFIG_ADAPTER.
Fixes: 226d528512cf ("iavf: fix locking of critical sections")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Konrad Jankowski <konrad0.jankowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
index 95d4348e7579..f39440ad5c50 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
@@ -4088,8 +4088,17 @@ static int iavf_open(struct net_device *netdev)
return -EIO;
}
- while (!mutex_trylock(&adapter->crit_lock))
+ while (!mutex_trylock(&adapter->crit_lock)) {
+ /* If we are in __IAVF_INIT_CONFIG_ADAPTER state the crit_lock
+ * is already taken and iavf_open is called from an upper
+ * device's notifier reacting on NETDEV_REGISTER event.
+ * We have to leave here to avoid dead lock.
+ */
+ if (adapter->state == __IAVF_INIT_CONFIG_ADAPTER)
+ return -EBUSY;
+
usleep_range(500, 1000);
+ }
if (adapter->state != __IAVF_DOWN) {
err = -EBUSY;
reply other threads:[~2022-08-22 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1661163325187157@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ivecera@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad0.jankowski@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox